Teams

Trail Hitters//EW

2022 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-21vs MoValley/Daniels/18&over 3.0 MSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKarlo DelosAngeles / Jonathan Lim vs Patrick Doughty / Andrew Swaim3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMartin Mata vs Cale Wright7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Jones / Darin Young vs Raylan Jennings / H Johnson1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMark Hybers / Robert Hardisty vs Gustavo Hernandez / Bill Garner6-0, 6-0
2022-06-07vs Rainey//OKCWon 31
L#1 DoublesChris Marks / Mike Olson vs Gideon Rainey / Cameron Esmon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMartin Mata vs Ramana Gudapati6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesArnold Nguyen / Robert Hardisty vs Tom Spector / Shawn Churchman6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Love / Nes Pinaroc vs Brett Baldwin / Thomas Simpson6-0, 6-1
2022-05-31vs MoValley/Daniels/18&over 3.0 MLost 23
L#1 DoublesChris Marks / Nes Pinaroc vs Andrew Swaim / H Johnson3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMartin Mata vs Dar Patel7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJonathan Lim / Karlo DelosAngeles vs James Mathis / Rene Gutierrez6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesPaul Jones vs Cale Wright3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMarden Winkler / William Stern vs Chad Wilson / Rafael Martinez6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-05-17vs Rainey//OKCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarden Winkler / Darin Young vs Christopher Anderson / Anmol Majithia7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChris Marks vs Micah Rainey6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMartin Mata / Karlo DelosAngeles vs Thomas Simpson / Ramana Gudapati4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-10vs MoValley/Daniels/18&over 3.0 MLost 12
L#1 DoublesKarlo DelosAngeles / Mark Hybers vs James Mathis / Andrew Swaim3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNes Pinaroc / Terry Fendley vs Tim Nelson / H Johnson4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChris Marks / Marden Winkler vs Raylan Jennings / Rafael Martinez6-1, 6-3
2022-04-26vs Rainey//OKCWon 40
W#1 DoublesNes Pinaroc / Terry Fendley vs Gideon Rainey / Micah Rainey6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMartin Mata vs Cameron Esmon6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMark Hybers / Chris Marks vs Shawn Churchman / Tom Spector7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPaul Jones vs Ramana Gudapati7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-19vs MoValley/Daniels/18&over 3.0 MWon 21
W#1 DoublesJonathan Lim / Chris Marks vs Raylan Jennings / Eric Stark6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMartin Mata vs Cale Wright4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Jones / Darin Young vs Rene Gutierrez / Chad Wilson1-6, 4-6
2022-04-05vs Rainey//OKCWon 21
L#1 DoublesKarlo DelosAngeles / Mark Hybers vs Christopher Anderson / Cameron Esmon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTerry Fendley / Nes Pinaroc vs Shawn Churchman / Tom Spector6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesArnold Nguyen / Robert Hardisty vs Thomas Simpson / JOHN KUHN6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MoValley/Daniels/18&over 3.0 M80301025285
2Trail Hitters//EW44211944332
3Rainey//OKC0893168450

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Marks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
2.83
Nes Pinaroc
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.79
Karlo DelosAngeles
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Darin Young
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Mark Hybers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Terry Fendley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Arnold Nguyen
published
Jonathan Lim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marden Winkler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Martin Mata
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Paul Jones
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Robert Hardisty
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nes Pinaroc + Terry Fendley3649% games+1.1% vs expected
Karlo DelosAngeles + Jonathan Lim2446% games−6.1% vs expected
Karlo DelosAngeles + Mark Hybers033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Marks
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nes Pinaroc
45W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
Karlo DelosAngeles
57W–85L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Darin Young
9W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Hybers
55W–78L career · 4 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
Terry Fendley
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.41
Arnold Nguyen
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jonathan Lim
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marden Winkler
5W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martin Mata
25W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Jones
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Hardisty
14W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.