Teams

Mike's 3.0 #1

2023 Adult 40 and Over League · 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-02-19vs Mike's 3.0 #2Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJose Lazo / Monty Tester vs Carl Bertelmann / Jack Grumet4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-02-12vs Mike's 3.0 #2Split 11
L#1 DoublesGary Marshall / Monty Tester vs Stefano Maffini / Robert Zimmerman2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Liu / Steve Ulene vs Carl Bertelmann / Michael Klotsman6-3, 6-1
2023-02-04vs Mike's 3.0 #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGary Marshall / Steve Ulene vs Steve Sutrov / Robert Zimmerman5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Liu / Monty Tester vs Gerald Kalua / Jeff Smith2-6, 5-7
2023-01-29vs Mike's 3.0 #2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Liu / Monty Tester vs Steve Sutrov / Robert Zimmerman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-01-21vs Mike's 3.0 #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Liu / Monty Tester vs Steve Sutrov / Robert Zimmerman1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesArnold Wunder vs Michael Klotsman5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJose Lazo / Steve Ulene vs Jack Grumet / Roy Okamoto6-2, 6-2
2023-01-15vs Mike's 3.0 #2Won 21
L#1 SinglesArnold Wunder vs Vicente Andaya6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Singlehurst / Monty Tester vs Stefano Maffini / Roy Okamoto6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Doral / Steve Ulene vs Carl Bertelmann / Jack Grumet6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Steve Ulene
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.87
Monty Tester
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.49
Arnold Wunder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Gary Marshall
published
Jose Lazo
published
Michael Kinoshita
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Singlehurst
published
Richard Doral
published
Thomas Liu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monty Tester + Thomas Liu91245% games−2.1% vs expected
Jose Lazo + Gary Marshall134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Steve Ulene
69W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Monty Tester
84W–87L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
2.5
Arnold Wunder
20W–52L career · type M · 2 lines in 2023
0%52%48%
2.49
Gary Marshall
8W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jose Lazo
7W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Kinoshita
30W–63L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Michael Singlehurst
24W–38L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Doral
8W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Liu
35W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.