Teams

THPRD-Kviz/Gallant

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cindy Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.74
Tina Kriebaum
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Jacqueline Babb Milligan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.45
Vanessa Gallant
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-06-07Split 11
W#1 DoublesTina Kriebaum / Minhhang Tran vs Emily Jones / Laurel Soot6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Babb Milligan vs Natalie Mesnier7-6, 6-1
2022-05-22Split 11
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Babb Milligan / Raquel Rich vs Kelley Malama / Sima Desai6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesVanessa Gallant vs Andrea Cedfeldt6-2, 6-0
2022-05-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Babb Milligan / Vanessa Gallant vs Cheri Mosbrucker / KC Bildner6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-08Won 20
W#1 DoublesVanessa Gallant / Raquel Rich vs Kari Court / Heather Davidson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Babb Milligan vs Olga Senashova6-3, 6-4
2022-04-30Split 11
L#1 DoublesRaquel Rich / Cindy Bennett vs Abby Pace / Jaime Venezia6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTina Kriebaum vs Heather Sirr6-1, 6-1
2022-04-24Split 11
L#1 DoublesTina Kriebaum / Denise Westby vs Anne Johnson / Irina Stolerman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCindy Bennett vs Geri Marcus4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesVanessa Gallant / Cindy Bennett vs Karla Hendrickson / Carmen Timberlake6-4, 6-2
2022-04-10Won 20
W#1 DoublesCindy Bennett / Vanessa Gallant vs Rhandi Edwards / Jing Bennett6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTina Kriebaum vs Yan Morrissey6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Cindy Bennett
47W–62L career
not enough data
3
Tina Kriebaum
32W–58L career
2%98%1%
2.74
3
Jacqueline Babb Milligan
35W–63L career
6%94%0%
2.69
3
Vanessa Gallant
31W–83L career
48%52%0%
2.45

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.