Teams

Spansel/18/5.5/NOD/CP

2025 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-09vs Barrington/18/5.5/NOD/CPWon 21
L#1 DoublesTaylor Spansel / Terri Mitchell vs Ashley Bowman / Sydnie Cole4-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesAllison Vega / Colleen Owen vs Nicki Barrington / Lindsay Yenni6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMelissa Occhi / Valerie Martinez vs Libby Fein / Amy Perry6-1, 6-0
2025-09-02vs DUNN/HOLMES/18/5.5/NOD/NOCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllison Vega / Ashley Delahoussaye vs Melyne Holmes / Casey Zainey1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Aucoin / Kristyn Dadlez vs Kendall Dunn / Natalie Erwin4-6, 4-6
2025-08-26vs Kazik/Wise/40/5.5/NOD/GACCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Vega / Melissa Occhi vs Alice Versher / Rachael Spencer2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesValerie Martinez / Katherine Olivard vs Nancy Schaefer / Denyse Boudreaux2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Delahoussaye / Lauren Hodgins vs Christine Bertucci / Leslie Clayton0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brittany Martin
published 3
2.54
Allison Vega
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Taylor Spansel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Kristyn Dadlez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Valerie Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Colleen Owen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Katherine Olivard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Melissa Aucoin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.98
Ashley Delahoussaye
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Lauren Hodgins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Occhi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Terri Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Vega + Melissa Occhi314 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Spansel + Valerie Martinez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brittany Martin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Allison Vega
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Taylor Spansel
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
Kristyn Dadlez
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.40
Valerie Martinez
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.26
2.5
Colleen Owen
1W–2L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Olivard
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.25
Melissa Aucoin
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Ashley Delahoussaye
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Lauren Hodgins
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Occhi
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri Mitchell
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.