Teams

Grand Hampton - M. Quinones

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesJennifer Carlson / Beatriz Cardona vs Susan Rind / Anita Vestal6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNeha Bishnoi vs Christine Assefa6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCynthia Ciarpelli / Kristi Schorr vs Julianna Holbrook / Denisse Riddle3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBeatriz Cardona vs Elizabeth DeConti6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNeha Bishnoi / Denise Stone vs Catherine Hoyord / Carmen Heggen6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCynthia Ciarpelli / Kristi Schorr vs Carol Guidera / Roseann McNichol4-6, 5-7
2023-05-08vs Cheval - B. BurdetteWon 10
W#1 SinglesBeatriz Cardona vs Anjali Singh7-6, 6-0
2023-05-01vs Westchase - P. HayesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Carlson / Neha Bishnoi vs Nicole Tamulski / Natalie Kuhn7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesBeatriz Cardona vs Lucia Mentani2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRaquel Mateos / Cynthia Ciarpelli vs Carmen Fiorito / Cara Anderson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesNeha Bishnoi / Danna Sturman vs Cindy Sparks / Hyun Kim6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBeatriz Cardona vs Pamela Woodham6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-17vs Palma Ceia Penn Pirates - N. GomezSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCynthia Ciarpelli / Denise Stone vs Jennifer Sawyer / Elizabeth Pento2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNeha Bishnoi / Jennifer Carlson vs Melissa Henderson / Alisa Davidson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-10vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesNeha Bishnoi / Denise Stone vs Jennifer Duglin / Anne Marie Lennox6-4, 7-5
2023-04-03vs Arbor Greene - C. VanMeterSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBeatriz Cardona vs Celeste Kallenborn6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJennifer Carlson / Neha Bishnoi vs Crystal Vanmeter / Kelley Coffey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Danna Sturman
published 3.5
3.16
Beatriz Cardona
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.89
Neha Bishnoi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.86
Cynthia Ciarpelli
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.73
Marieglory Quinones
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danna Sturman
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Beatriz Cardona
105W–75L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Neha Bishnoi
87W–63L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
3.5
Cynthia Ciarpelli
56W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
2.86
Marieglory Quinones
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.