Teams

SS-LGT BLUE

2025 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-06vs KC-CC YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Scott Sanders vs Krystal Joscelyne / Dave Joscelyne6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTommy Knappich / Danielle Butler vs Susan Pine / Rob Pine7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLisa McGavern / Chuck McGavern vs Kathleen Rose / Jason Rose5-7, 1-6
2025-06-29vs BCST ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa McGavern / Chuck McGavern vs Apryl Brennan / James Brennan7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPhil Braaten / Marla Schroeder vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-20vs NJ REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarla Schroeder / Phil Braaten vs Paul Curtin / Jackie Greiner1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Scott Sanders vs Brian Hoekelman / Liz Mercado6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJane Braaten / Tommy Knappich vs Regina Stewart / Eric Eiseman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-15vs LEBTC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesTommy Knappich / Danielle Butler vs Kara Edmiston Lavaux / Gray Bullard6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJane Braaten / Bret Schroeder vs Emily Dreyer / Jamie Dreyer2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Fanganello / Phil Braaten vs Suzanne Termaat / Stephan Termaat6-7, 3-6
2025-06-01vs BCST YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa McGavern / Bret Schroeder vs Michelle Johnston / Scott Johnston6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChuck McGavern / Danielle Butler vs Ann Symalla / Lloyd Cuthbertson6-2, 6-2
2025-05-25vs PH GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Scott Sanders vs Brian Kinnear / Christina Quigley6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJane Braaten / Bret Schroeder vs Teri Markle / Marc Rakowski6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChuck McGavern / Anne Fanganello vs Stacie Rudy / Jeff Kesselman3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BP RED6117411154
2PRKR ORANGE6116511123
3SS-H PURPLE6114720182
4DTP RED5215615158
5LTA-Q BLUE5213817161
6SS-LGT BLUE52111024200
7GTC RED5212924189
8DTC YELLOW4312918175
9HG ORANGE4312920187
10LEBTC GREEN43111021189
11MC ORANGE34101124192
12SH GREEN34111025199
13GPTC BLUE34101125208
14GCC ORANGE34111027202
15LTA-Q ORANGE3481328202
16LTFC BLUE3481329215
17BRMST BLUE2591226190
18LTFC RED2581331215
19SKY PURPLE2561533232
20NJ YELLOW1661532234
21MEA NAVY1651635236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Lisa McGavern
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Danielle Butler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Cheryl Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Marla Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Jane Braaten
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Anne Fanganello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Phil Braaten
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.48
Bret Schroeder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Chuck McGavern
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Kathryn Ross
published
Scott Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tommy Knappich
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Braaten + Phil Braaten84533% games−8.8% vs expected
Lisa McGavern + Chuck McGavern71839% games−20.2% vs expected
Cheryl Sanders + Scott Sanders161452% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Butler + Tommy Knappich91149% gamesnot enough data
Marla Schroeder + Bret Schroeder01330% gamesnot enough data
Jane Braaten + Bret Schroeder4155% gamesnot enough data
Anne Fanganello + Bret Schroeder134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa McGavern + Tommy Knappich314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa McGavern
67W–127L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Danielle Butler
119W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Cheryl Sanders
133W–123L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.11
Marla Schroeder
44W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Jane Braaten
103W–196L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Anne Fanganello
81W–138L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
2.5
Phil Braaten
26W–85L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%22%78%
2.60
2.5
Bret Schroeder
20W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Chuck McGavern
9W–20L career · type M · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathryn Ross
15W–35L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Sanders
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tommy Knappich
17W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.