Teams

Burkwood - Shute

2026 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-05vs Raintree BryanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrew Barth / Kirk Clausen vs Brad Houff / Shekhar Nagendra1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Shute / Joseph Golden vs William Bryan / Alex Darragh6-2, 6-4
2026-07-28vs ACAC KochWon 30
W#1 DoublesKirk Clausen / Mike Davis vs Alan Singer / John Jones4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRodney Cole / Travis Prowant vs Dave Booth / Jeff Moehling6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoseph Golden / Richard Shute vs Jeffrey Raihall / Randy Koch6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-27vs Westwood West/LemcoLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Shute / Mike Davis vs Kirby Fields / Dave Mulholland2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Hazelwood / Michael Jernigan vs Mark Wickersham / Scott Dillard1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Ames / Travis Prowant vs Lonnie Lemco / Ken West4-6, 2-6
2026-07-14vs Avalon - HellengaWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Bailey / Kirk Clausen vs Jason Hetherington / Mark Schultz6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Hazelwood / Michael Jernigan vs Darrell Jervey / Gregory Blouch6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRonald Rienecker / Richard Shute vs Joseph Piwowarski / Brian Hellenga6-2, 6-0
2026-07-08vs MAC - HaynesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoseph Golden / Mark Hudson vs Lance Pessarra / Charlie Wilson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Ames / Travis Prowant vs Lyman Brown / Paul Haynes6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Bailey / Ronald Rienecker vs Johnny Tyous / John Ward2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-07vs ACAC McFaddenWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Barth / Mike Davis vs Randolph Moore / Stone Smith4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoseph Golden / Richard Shute vs Joseph Cipolla / Karl Jones6-4, 6-5
L#3 DoublesMichael Hazelwood / Michael Jernigan vs Marshall Forbes / Anant Singh3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-30vs Avalon GhitaLost 03
L#1 DoublesMike Davis / Travis Prowant vs Mike Melson / James Melson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Barth / Rodney Cole vs Jesse Pasco / Guillermo Pardo3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKirk Clausen / Joseph Golden vs Ian Shupack / Todd Mungo5-7, 2-6
2026-06-17vs Bon Air Stephens 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMike Davis / Mark Hudson vs Roger Wisor / Donald Hoover5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Barth / Kirk Clausen vs Paul Haley / David Aschheim2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Hazelwood / Michael Jernigan vs Kevin Cousins / Erich Yost7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Raintree Bryan7118617173
2Bon Air Stephens 7.06217719182
3ACAC Koch53121227200
4Burkwood - Shute53121229224
5Ridgetop Barila's Gorillas43111024200
6Westwood West/Lemco35101431219
7Avalon - Hellenga0842041276

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Michael Hazelwood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Andrew Barth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Mike Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
David Ames
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Travis Prowant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Joseph Golden
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kirk Clausen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Mark Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Jernigan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Shute
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Rodney Cole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ronald Rienecker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirk Clausen + Andrew Barth3353% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Golden + Richard Shute5165% gamesnot enough data
Michael Hazelwood + Michael Jernigan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Hazelwood
14W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Andrew Barth
17W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Mike Davis
95W–71L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
David Ames
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.13
Travis Prowant
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
Joseph Golden
15W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kirk Clausen
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Hudson
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Jernigan
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Shute
8W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rodney Cole
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ronald Rienecker
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.