Teams

Yadkin/Reilly/18+

2025 Yadkin Valley Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men-Monday (night)

14 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-19vs Yadkin/Ivester/18+4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Montessi / Mark Yamane vs Corey Davis / William Crabtree6-2, 6-4
2025-04-29vs Yadkin/Ivester/18+4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Montessi / Mark Yamane vs Josh Ivester / Mason Norman6-2, 6-2
2025-04-28vs Yadkin/Ivester/18+4.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesAdam Montessi vs Ranganadh Vemuri6-2, 6-1
2025-04-12vs Yadkin/Moxley/18+4.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesAdam Montessi vs Jack Bollinger6-1, 6-2
2025-03-17vs Yadkin/Ivester/18+4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Montessi / Mark Yamane vs Adam Witten / Taylor McDaniel6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-10vs Yadkin/Moxley/18+4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesAdam Montessi / Mark Yamane vs Steve Moxley / Christopher Moxley6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men-Monday (night) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Mark Yamane
published
4.03
Adam Montessi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.93
Matthew Wright
published
3.92
Paul Daggs
published
3.92
Aeimit Lakdawala
published 4
3.82
Max Sandberg
published
3.80
Chris Reilly
published 4
Ben Daniel
published 4
3.72
Will Jordan-Leonard
published
3.67
Huan Tran
published
3.60
Daniel Hege
published 4
3.58
Andrew Backus
published 3.5
3.46
Scott Saffer
published
Jorge Estrada
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Wright + Will Jordan-Leonard4160% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Hege + Matthew Wright213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Yamane
17W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
4.16
4
Adam Montessi
124W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.03
Matthew Wright
30W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
Paul Daggs
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Aeimit Lakdawala
13W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
Max Sandberg
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Chris Reilly
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Ben Daniel
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Will Jordan-Leonard
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Huan Tran
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Daniel Hege
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Andrew Backus
35W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Scott Saffer
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Jorge Estrada
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.