Teams

BC-RedondoUnion/CarlosRomero

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-02vs BC-WestEnd/DrewIsleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesSebastian HEINRICH / TEVIN JENKINS vs Tom Hindman / Philip Vorsilak6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-10-28vs BC-Kramer/BrianKebschullWon 10
W#1 DoublesSebastian HEINRICH / TEVIN JENKINS vs Nicholas Starinieri / Kevin Escobar7-5, 6-2
2023-10-21vs BC-AltaVista/JamesHartLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnurag Anand / TEVIN JENKINS vs Jin Wen / Mattias Tornyi6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-10-07vs BC-MCC/TonyRojkoWon 10
W#2 DoublesSebastian HEINRICH / TEVIN JENKINS vs Jeffrey Alder / Dylan Tinker6-4, 6-3
2023-09-30vs BC-Peninsula/JesseWuWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnurag Anand / TEVIN JENKINS vs Patrick Yang / Kevin Thoeng6-3, 6-1
2023-09-23vs BC-LLW-BJKTC/JeffSamoffWon 10
W#2 DoublesSebastian HEINRICH / TEVIN JENKINS vs Mitchell Pruitt / Michael Ngo6-0, 6-1
2023-09-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnurag Anand / TEVIN JENKINS vs Amit Bhatia / Matthew Johnson6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Nigel Beckmeier
published
4.14
TEVIN JENKINS
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.10
Bryan Hudson
published 4.5
3.95
Renaldo Goncalves
published
3.86
Sebastian HEINRICH
published
3.83
Dara Oum
published 4
3.79
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.77
Peter Hsu
published
3.71
Rodney Litorja
published
3.64
Anurag Anand
published 4
3.53
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
published
Ryan Harrison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rodney Litorja + Dara Oum5455% games−0.8% vs expected
Richard Ortiz-Reyes + Miguel Ortiz-Reyes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nigel Beckmeier
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
TEVIN JENKINS
105W–50L career · 7 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Bryan Hudson
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
Renaldo Goncalves
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.95
Sebastian HEINRICH
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Dara Oum
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
25W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Peter Hsu
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Rodney Litorja
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Anurag Anand
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
29W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
Ryan Harrison
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.