Teams

Polk/T. Love

2022 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-13vs Winter Haven - J. PayneWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Johnson / Courtney Philpot vs Christina Beissinger / Jackie Wyckoff6-2, 6-4
2022-05-24vs Alley Kittens - Beerman TchipanovaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRosa Jean / Julie Goodwin vs Desiree Tchipanova / Allison Sorenson0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Angela Johnson vs Rose Coulton / Karen Hogg4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-23vs Beerman - Grieger/EspitiaLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Philpot / Julie Goodwin vs Kim Martin / Ginger Davis3-6, 1-6
2022-05-16vs WHCC - J. BurnsWon 20
W#2 DoublesTiffany Choe / Rosa Jean vs Brittany Ward / Leilani Guinn3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Goodwin / Tina Marcewicz vs Christine Ingram / Andrea Jahna4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-09vs Alley Kittens - Beerman TchipanovaLost 02
L#2 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Tiffany Choe vs Nathaly Arredondo / Hayley Hurd2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRosa Jean / Alice Collins vs Kristin Wyatt / Karen Hogg2-6, 0-6
2022-05-02vs Winter Haven - J. PayneWon 10
W#2 DoublesCourtney Philpot / Tina Marcewicz vs Laura Barben / Hilary Crenshaw7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-11vs WHCC - J. BurnsLost 01
L#3 DoublesCourtney Philpot / Tina Marcewicz vs Brittany Ward / Leilani Guinn1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Tiffany Choe
published
3.47
Tiffany Love
published
3.15
Leslie Simmons
published
3.07
Brandye Pickering
published 3.5
2.87
Tina Marcewicz
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.75
Courtney Philpot
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.57
Julie Goodwin
published
2.51
Rosalinda Collins
published
2.35
Rosa Jean
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Philpot + Tina Marcewicz192249% games+15.1% vs expected
Leslie Simmons + Tiffany Love10461% games+9.7% vs expected
Rosa Jean + Tina Marcewicz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Choe
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
Tiffany Love
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
Leslie Simmons
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Brandye Pickering
10W–9L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Tina Marcewicz
110W–80L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Courtney Philpot
79W–74L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.75
Julie Goodwin
6W–21L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
Rosalinda Collins
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
2.51
Rosa Jean
28W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.