Teams

HCC - J. Orsini

2025 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.44 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-12vs Hills/Evans/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdwin Jagger / Chris New vs Thor Raabe / Chris Ricketts3-6, 5-7
2025-04-05vs Hills/Evans/55&Over9.0MWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdwin Jagger / Jeffrey Winkler vs James Evans / Thor Raabe6-4, 6-2
2025-03-22vs Hills/Evans/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesEdwin Jagger / Jeffrey Winkler vs Jamie Mckibban / Gerardo Cuevas5-7, 1-6
2025-03-08vs Hills/Evans/55&Over9.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesEdwin Jagger / Jeffrey Winkler vs Jim Overton / Jeffrey Evans6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharles Gauthier / Chris New vs Jamie Mckibban / Gerardo Cuevas6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-03-01vs Hills/Evans/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesCharles Gauthier / Chris New vs Jim Overton / Jeffrey Evans7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-08vs Hills/Evans/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdwin Jagger / Jeff Davis vs Gerardo Cuevas / Ken Jackson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Gabriel Mattos
published 4.5
4.42
Edwin Jagger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.40
Chris Canfield
published 4.5
4.38
Charles Gauthier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Ignacio Molina
published 4.5
4.32
Chris New
published 4.5
4.15
Hartmut Liebel
published 4.5
Chris Crump
published 4
Jeffrey Winkler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ignacio Molina + Edwin Jagger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gabriel Mattos
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Edwin Jagger
57W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Chris Canfield
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
4.40
4.5
Charles Gauthier
34W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Ignacio Molina
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Chris New
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Hartmut Liebel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.15
4
Chris Crump
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Winkler
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.