Teams

De.Meares40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-05vs Vi.Conzola40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRhett Hartley / Derek Meares vs Joseph Cockrell / David Swann7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMike Kaelin / Mike Pearce vs Travis Payne / Chris Saillant1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-21vs Fr.Sun40CLost 02
L#2 DoublesMike Kaelin / Mike Pearce vs Francis Sun / Aaron Earwood3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChris MacPherson / Derek Meares vs Paul Shuey / Edward Maginnis3-6, 1-6
2023-09-19vs Sh.Lav40CLost 02
L#2 DoublesMike Kaelin / Chris MacPherson vs Michael Shaw / Omar EL-Kaissi0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDerek Meares / Mike Pearce vs Scott Arra / Chun Lav4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-09-14vs Wi.Mooney40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesMike Pearce / Mike Kaelin vs Bryan Simpson / Russell Lewis1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRhett Hartley / Derek Meares vs Andrew Tate / Preston Waldo4-6, 3-6
2023-09-06vs Jo.Gouveia40CWon 10
W#2 DoublesMike Kaelin / Rhett Hartley vs David Boyce / Cameron Burch6-1, 6-2
2023-08-23vs Jo.Markham40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesMike Kaelin / Mike Pearce vs Joe Neylan / Jonathan Adams1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStephen Jorge / Derek Meares vs John Vander Vennet / Darin Meyer4-6, 3-6
2023-08-16vs St.Wingo40C7.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesMike Kaelin / Mike Pearce vs Stan Wingo / Roy Kelly6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJason DeGroff / Derek Meares vs John Noland / Joseph Brown3-6, 2-6
2023-08-09vs Vi.Conzola40CWon 10
W#3 DoublesMike Kaelin / Derek Meares vs Joseph Cockrell / Travis Payne3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Brad Killian
published 3.5
3.44
Mike Kaelin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.40
Rhett Hartley
published
3.34
Matt Mikula
published
3.06
Derek Meares
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Jason DeGroff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Kaelin + Derek Meares1839% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brad Killian
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Mike Kaelin
104W–73L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
Rhett Hartley
11W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Matt Mikula
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Derek Meares
68W–148L career · 7 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Jason DeGroff
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.