Teams

CCRC - Steinberg

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 65 & Over - Fall '24 · Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-01-07vs CSRATA/Philippa WilliamsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMargie Staples / Cathy Moseley vs Patricia Thomas / Deborah Mitton3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTerri Thaxton / Ann McQuaig vs Charlotte Thompson / Kathy Thomas6-1, 6-3
2024-12-03vs CSRATA/Philippa WilliamsLost 03
L#1 DoublesGloria Mattson / Terri Thaxton vs Judy Butler / Denise Daniel3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCathy Moseley / Joan Steinberg vs Patricia Thomas / Kathy Thomas3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVivian York / Ann McQuaig vs Philippa Williams / Mary Beth Elliott3-6, 1-6
2024-11-24vs Mount Vintage - LusbyLost 12
L#1 DoublesCathy Moseley / Margie Staples vs Linda Vanderford / Ann Fago3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTerri Thaxton / Gloria Mattson vs Chris Webster / Marsha Lusby1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVivian York / Joan Steinberg vs Susan Kaeding / Terri Reynolds2-6, 3-6
2024-11-17vs Mount Vintage - LusbyLost 03
L#1 DoublesVivian York / Gloria Mattson vs Chris Corn / Susan Kaeding1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMargie Staples / Cathy Moseley vs Linda Vanderford / Laura Conrey2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerri Thaxton / Ann McQuaig vs Susan Watson / Ann Fago1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mount Vintage - Lusby3184979
2CSRATA/Philippa Williams3184998
3CCRC - Steinberg0421021132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cathy Moseley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Vivian York
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Terri Thaxton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Margie Staples
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Gloria Mattson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Cynthia Zgol
published 3
2.80
Joan Steinberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Ann McQuaig
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vivian York + Gloria Mattson4443% games−3.5% vs expected
Terri Thaxton + Vivian York2348% games−5.8% vs expected
Terri Thaxton + Gloria Mattson3348% gamesnot enough data
Joan Steinberg + Gloria Mattson1435% gamesnot enough data
Cathy Moseley + Joan Steinberg134 matchesnot enough data
Terri Thaxton + Ann McQuaig123 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Moseley + Margie Staples033 matchesnot enough data
Ann McQuaig + Vivian York033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy Moseley
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vivian York
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Terri Thaxton
10W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
Margie Staples
19W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Gloria Mattson
22W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Cynthia Zgol
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Joan Steinberg
3W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.80
3
Ann McQuaig
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.