Teams

OC Coto De Caza - 9am

2023 Adult Summer Doubles · Credits

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Credits have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Sara Scarbo
published 3.5
3.22
Patty Rydelski
published
3.15
Lissett MacHado
published
3.14
Pam Schuler
published 3.5
3.09
Sarah Cieslik
published
3.07
Nicole Miranda
published
3.02
Lynda Sims
published
2.99
Sherry Harley
published
2.94
Emily Moradi
published 3
2.91
Kristina Hellinga
published
2.81
Irene Suber
published 3
Allison Mandel
published 3
Theresa Alley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Miranda + Pam Schuler2439% gamesnot enough data
Sherry Harley + Lynda Sims314 matchesnot enough data
Sherry Harley + Nicole Miranda213 matchesnot enough data
Lynda Sims + Pam Schuler123 matchesnot enough data
Pam Schuler + Sara Scarbo303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sara Scarbo
31W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
Patty Rydelski
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Lissett MacHado
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Pam Schuler
93W–60L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.14
Sarah Cieslik
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.09
Nicole Miranda
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
Lynda Sims
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.02
Sherry Harley
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Emily Moradi
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kristina Hellinga
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Irene Suber
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Allison Mandel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Theresa Alley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.