Teams

Walker-DCTRC

2025 Adult 18 & Over-DLT · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-22vs Goldberg-GCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAli Santucci / Schyler Cannatella vs Beth Williams / Sloane Fair0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKelly McCorkle vs Rachel Goldberg2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Haskins Patton / Ashley Brown vs Meagan Litton / Lucy Swayze6-3, 6-2
2025-04-01vs Shamoon-GGCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesKelly McCorkle vs ELIZABETH STALLWORTH6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSchyler Cannatella / Chevy Davis vs Nancy Mason / Jami Smith6-2, 6-1
2025-03-30vs Brown-CCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKayla Walker / Kelly McCorkle vs Meredith Fletcher / Amanda Roberts3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMeredith Loudon / Anna Haskins Patton vs Ana Parker Davis / Brianna Keeton6-1, 6-4
2025-03-20vs Goldberg-GCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly McCorkle / Mary Austin vs Rachel Goldberg / Lisa Smith1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChevy Davis / Meredith Loudon vs Sloane Fair / Beth Williams6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-18vs Brown-CCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeredith Loudon / Ashley Brown vs Amy Martinez / Mallorey Campbell4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKelly McCorkle vs Carley Brown6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAli Santucci / Katiebeth Maddox vs Amanda Roberts / Shelby Carter0-6, 3-6
2025-03-06vs Shamoon-GGCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesKayla Walker / Schyler Cannatella vs Mary Margaret Jones / Kim Rainwater3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKelly McCorkle vs ELIZABETH STALLWORTH6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChevy Davis / Ali Santucci vs Jami Smith / Terri Murrell6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.42
Meredith Loudon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Chevy Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Ali Santucci
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.10
Anna Haskins Patton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Katiebeth Maddox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly McCorkle
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Schyler Cannatella
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Haskins Patton + Meredith Loudon134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Loudon
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.42
2.5
Chevy Davis
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ali Santucci
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.20
2.5
Anna Haskins Patton
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Katiebeth Maddox
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kelly McCorkle
3W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Schyler Cannatella
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.