Teams

Lagoon - Sellers - 3.0 - 55 - Fall - Night

2024 · 2025 Fall USTA 55 & Over Night League

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 Fall USTA 55 & Over Night League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Kim McDonald
published
3.32
Holly Sharp
published
3.10
DEBRA SLEDGE
published 3
3.05
Karen Agnello
published
2.81
Chrissy Foxworth
published 3
2.73
Beth Sadler
published 3
2.72
Jewell Pitts
published
2.67
Felicia Brooks
published
2.64
Lori Milner
published
2.43
Gina Sellers
published
Karen Mosier
published
Lynne Schneider
published
Mary Loy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Agnello + Felicia Brooks5159% games+8.4% vs expected
DEBRA SLEDGE + Karen Agnello6266% games+1.9% vs expected
Gina Sellers + Karen Agnello6846% games−2.2% vs expected
Gina Sellers + Kim McDonald1442% gamesnot enough data
Lynne Schneider + Holly Sharp2347% gamesnot enough data
Kim McDonald + Karen Agnello224 matchesnot enough data
Karen Agnello + Chrissy Foxworth314 matchesnot enough data
Gina Sellers + Lori Milner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim McDonald
23W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Holly Sharp
63W–29L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3
DEBRA SLEDGE
36W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Karen Agnello
61W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Chrissy Foxworth
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Beth Sadler
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Jewell Pitts
8W–29L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Felicia Brooks
20W–52L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Lori Milner
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Gina Sellers
23W–48L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.43
Karen Mosier
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynne Schneider
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Loy
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.