Teams

GTC NAVY

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-01vs CACM GREYLost 23
L#1 DoublesThomas O'Keefe / Glenn Tacke vs Brian Wylie / Tobias Krause5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Washer vs Dirk McDermott6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCraig Claxton / Jonathan Watkin vs Stephen Clarke / Will Jarvis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAndrew Hamilton vs Tim Hester7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Moore / Andrew Pham vs Michael Sanders / Tom Weaver6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-26vs SKY SILVERWon 32
L#1 DoublesJonathan Watkin / Craig Claxton vs Kevin Breault / Brian Winterling7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Washer vs Ned Rule6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGlenn Tacke / Thomas O'Keefe vs Mark Martinet / Daniel Cho7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAndrew Pham vs David Bacon6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCharles Bono / Eric Clayman vs Chris Burckhardt / Chad Murray6-4, 6-4
2022-05-25vs WP REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesCraig Claxton / Jonathan Watkin vs BRIAN ROSENTHAL / Daniel Chin4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAndrew Hamilton vs Alan Simpson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJason Schild / Charles Blanchette vs Ali Barghelame / Erik Graver6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEric Clayman / Charles Bono vs Justin Jelinek / Jeff Kinzler4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-18vs APR GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesJason Schild / Michael Washer vs John Cordova / Kevin Matney6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrew Pham vs Max Grassby4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGlenn Tacke / Charles Blanchette vs Thorvald Nelson / Mark Kruk6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Bono / Eric Clayman vs Jack Kirtland / Richard Pond6-3, 6-4
2022-05-11vs CP REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesThomas O'Keefe / Glenn Tacke vs Kendall Lin / Eric Eiteljorg1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Washer vs John Kelleher5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAndrew Hamilton vs Brandon Frawley6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCharles Blanchette / Eric Clayman vs Antonio Vigil / Ark Wang6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-27vs EM REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesThomas O'Keefe / Glenn Tacke vs Mark Lindstrom / Gregory Fritsch6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrew Pham vs Kent Redding6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJason Schild / Jonathan Watkin vs Joseph Burke / Eric Lamar7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAndrew Hamilton vs Jake Tiernan6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCharles Bono / Eric Clayman vs Martin Gaeth / Sean OConnor2-6, 2-6
2022-04-20vs GTC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesThomas O'Keefe / Glenn Tacke vs Philip Timberlake / Ryan MacDowell2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Claxton / Jonathan Watkin vs Raghav Mathur / Trevor Emery6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Washer vs Wesley Oliver6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Moore / Charles Blanchette vs Chris Koehn / Kenneth Kinderwater6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Michael Washer
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.91
Andrew Hamilton
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.83
Andrew Pham
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
Charles Blanchette
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Charles Bono
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eric Clayman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Craig Claxton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Glenn Tacke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Jonathan Watkin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Jason Schild
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenn Tacke + Michael Washer4355% games−2.2% vs expected
Charles Bono + Eric Clayman151346% games−2.7% vs expected
Craig Claxton + Jonathan Watkin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Washer
104W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
4.14
4
Andrew Hamilton
17W–29L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Andrew Pham
24W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Charles Blanchette
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Charles Bono
15W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Eric Clayman
26W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Craig Claxton
42W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Glenn Tacke
46W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Jonathan Watkin
26W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jason Schild
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.