Teams

6-NPike-HVCC

2022 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · Eno River 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Eno River 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Elisabeth Wiener
published 3.5
3.14
Joan Mueller
published
3.07
Nancy Pike
published
3.03
Ruth Caccavale
published
3.02
Thekla Pappas
published
2.84
Laurie Myer
published
2.79
Kathleen Remmer
published
2.79
Mary Grigg
published
Beth Sholtz
published 3
2.71
Caroline Carrico
published 3
2.43
Susan Peak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Mueller + Ruth Caccavale213 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Caccavale + Nancy Pike123 matchesnot enough data
Thekla Pappas + Beth Sholtz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elisabeth Wiener
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Joan Mueller
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Nancy Pike
22W–32L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
Ruth Caccavale
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Thekla Pappas
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.02
Laurie Myer
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.84
Kathleen Remmer
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.79
Mary Grigg
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Beth Sholtz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Caroline Carrico
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Susan Peak
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.