Teams

Block Party

Fire & Ice 2025 - NA · Fire & Ice 4.5 Division

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-07vs NetchicksLost 12
L#1 DoublesMariela Monagas / Angelica Padilla vs Holly Perry / Robynn Sweet1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDanielle Spencer / Lauren Villegas vs Nancy Price / MEGAN SIMANK6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBeverly Rowland / Holly Hayes vs Pam Gandy / Julie Alvarez4-6, 3-6
2025-12-07vs NetchicksLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Villegas / Danielle Spencer vs Lacey Kohnen / Julie Alvarez5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLuz Danya Rivera / Angelica Padilla vs Nancy Price / Holly Perry0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHolly Hayes / Stacey Boebel vs Robynn Sweet / Linda Wooster6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-12-06vs NetchicksWon 21
L#1 DoublesLuz Danya Rivera / Beverly Rowland vs Nancy Price / Holly Perry1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Spencer / Lauren Villegas vs Pam Gandy / Linda Wooster5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Boebel / Holly Hayes vs Robynn Sweet / MEGAN SIMANK6-1, 6-1
2025-12-06vs NetchicksWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeverly Rowland / Holly Hayes vs Holly Perry / Julie Alvarez4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Villegas / Danielle Spencer vs Lacey Kohnen / Robynn Sweet4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVirginia Kaklamani / Angelica Padilla vs Nancy Price / Pam Gandy5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-12-05vs NetchicksLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Spencer / Stacey Boebel vs Lacey Kohnen / Jessey Martinez1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngelica Padilla / Luz Danya Rivera vs Holly Perry / Nancy Price5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBeverly Rowland / Holly Hayes vs Julie Alvarez / MEGAN SIMANK6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fire & Ice 4.5 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Stacey Boebel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.45
Lauren Villegas
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Beverly Rowland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Virginia Kaklamani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Holly Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.12
Danielle Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.10
Alexandria Vafadari
published 4.5
3.89
Angelica Padilla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.79
Mariela Monagas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Luz Danya Rivera
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luz Danya Rivera + Angelica Padilla0523% gamesnot enough data
Beverly Rowland + Holly Hayes224 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Spencer + Lauren Villegas314 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Spencer + Virginia Kaklamani134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Boebel
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.52
Lauren Villegas
29W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Beverly Rowland
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Virginia Kaklamani
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Holly Hayes
18W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Danielle Spencer
27W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Alexandria Vafadari
21W–16L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Angelica Padilla
2W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.89
Mariela Monagas
24W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Luz Danya Rivera
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.