Teams

18 & Over 4.0X Fate - JC

2026 USTA Mixed 18 & Over League - NNM · 4.0 Mixed

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-15vs 18 & Over 4.0X Cusetino - HPLost 12
L#1 DoublesAubrey Portwood / Ashley Portwood vs Zack Coker / Jessica Spooner6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlex Fortuna / Christy DeGuio vs Phillip Kay / Darcy Odom2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEliot Cho / Christine Spears vs Andrew Litzinger / Mary Alice Cusentino4-6, 1-6
2026-08-03vs 18 & Over 4.0X Clark - Lobo ClubWon 30
W#1 DoublesRon Oldfield / Nina Denisova vs Katie Joshi / Kevin Roessler6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Portwood / Eliot Cho vs Kirstin Spindler / Mark Friedman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrady Spears / Christine Spears vs Meshi Chavez / Alexis Spindler7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-29vs 18 & Over 4.0X Mutz - JCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Portwood / Aubrey Portwood vs Zachary Mufti / Anna Briones1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAshley Fate / Andrew Lacaden vs Tiffany Liu / Alex Salmon7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAlex Fortuna / Christy DeGuio vs Nicholas Romero / Lesley Rodriguez4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-19vs 18 & Over 4.0X Hurts So Good - AAWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Portwood / Aubrey Portwood vs Tonya Tuggle / Eric Tuggle7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristy DeGuio / Ron Oldfield vs Lisa Wynne / Eric Shields6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAshley Fate / Andrew Lacaden vs Mine Baran / Ernesto Victor Jayme6-3, 6-1
2026-07-12vs 18 & Over 4.0X Maraist - FLWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Portwood / Aubrey Portwood vs Clare Maraist / David Lee6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristine Spears / Brady Spears vs Peter Trevisani / Kate Ferlic4-3
W#3 DoublesSimran Bhardwaj / Ron Oldfield vs Raleigh Henry / Jana Sanchez7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Ron Oldfield
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.91
Aubrey Portwood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Andrew Lacaden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.89
Alex Fortuna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.86
Ashley Portwood
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.86
Brady Spears
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Eliot Cho
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.70
Stefani Vallejos
published
3.67
Leo Qualls
published
3.61
Christine Spears
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Samantha Lambrecht
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Christy DeGuio
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
Ashley Fate
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Nina Denisova
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Mike Parrish
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.44
Simran Bhardwaj
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aubrey Portwood + Ashley Portwood151152% games+2.1% vs expected
Ashley Fate + Mike Parrish9063% gamesnot enough data
Brady Spears + Christine Spears6063% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Fate + Andrew Lacaden4157% gamesnot enough data
Stefani Vallejos + Mike Parrish224 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Lambrecht + Mike Parrish213 matchesnot enough data
Eliot Cho + Ashley Portwood303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ron Oldfield
131W–78L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Aubrey Portwood
63W–45L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Andrew Lacaden
10W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Alex Fortuna
20W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Ashley Portwood
51W–59L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Brady Spears
26W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
Eliot Cho
63W–60L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Stefani Vallejos
71W–21L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Leo Qualls
40W–56L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Christine Spears
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Samantha Lambrecht
42W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Christy DeGuio
25W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Ashley Fate
93W–61L career · 6 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.56
Nina Denisova
24W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Mike Parrish
44W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.46
Simran Bhardwaj
25W–5L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.