Teams

Payne Park Hall 70

2025 Sarasota Social 70 & Over Fall · 7.0 W Wednesdays

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-10vs Courtside FeldmeierWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesLinda Kretlow / Mona Harrington vs Jenny Spencer / Sally Pym6-2, 6-4
2025-12-03vs Meadows Purple YaYasLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesJanet Hepner / Linda Kretlow vs Alice Levine / Linda Hosmer4-6, 3-6
2025-11-12vs IslandWalk ThawleySplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesJanet Hepner / Linda Kretlow vs Nancy Dickson / Linda Sleet6-3, 6-3
L#2 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Marianne Zentz vs Trish Connolly / Alaine Troisi2-6, 2-6
2025-10-29vs Courtside FeldmeierWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Linda Kretlow vs Lorraine Lynn / Sally Pym6-3, 6-0
2025-10-15vs Royal PaynesWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesJanet Hepner / Linda Kretlow vs Dian Cuellar / Ann Hollins6-0, 6-1
W#3 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Marianne Zentz vs Carol Dougherty / Susan Stasiak6-1, 6-0
2025-10-08vs IslandWalk ThawleyLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Joan Hatch vs Mae Rose / Barbara Babb3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesdays have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cheryl Black
published 3.5
3.24
Marianne Zentz
published
3.19
Beverly Austgen
published 3.5
Janet Hepner
published
Jean Floyd
published
Jill Bressler
published
JoMarie Privitera
published
Joyce Ottinger
published
Linda Kretlow
usually #1 Female Doubles 80%, also #2 Female Doubles 20% · published
Mona Harrington
usually #2 Female Doubles 60%, also #3 Female Doubles 20% · published
Sigi Moriece
published
Taffy Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Kretlow + Mona Harrington181453% gamesnot enough data
Janet Hepner + Linda Kretlow7644% gamesnot enough data
Joyce Ottinger + Mona Harrington314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Black
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marianne Zentz
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Beverly Austgen
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
Janet Hepner
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jean Floyd
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Bressler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
JoMarie Privitera
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joyce Ottinger
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Kretlow
38W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mona Harrington
128W–145L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sigi Moriece
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Taffy Anderson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.