Teams

Smith: Valley Southwoods

NA 2024 Iowa Tri-Level League · Mixed Tri-Level 7.0-8.0-9.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.08 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-21vs Pham: Valley SouthwoodsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeff Ditsworth / Katie Kelleher vs Jenn Willis / Scott Peterson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Whipps / Angela Torgerson vs Willow Bauer / Brent Hanson2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNathan Johnston / Cristen Schipper vs Sara Peterson / Mike Sylvester3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-07-14vs Pham: Valley SouthwoodsLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Ditsworth / Tim Paulson vs Amanda Hilton / Nathan Greiner2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCalla Whipp / Jeff Ditsworth vs Sara Peterson / Scott Peterson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStephanie Anania / Matthew Morgan vs Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf / Max Wilker3-6, 1-6
2024-07-07vs Pham: Valley SouthwoodsLost 12
W#1 DoublesSiri Long / Jeff Ditsworth vs Heidi Hill-Matthes / Brent Hanson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatie Kelleher / Matthew Whipps vs Leslie Shipp / Martin Fisher Jr6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCalla Whipp / Tony DAntuono vs Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf / Mike Sylvester4-6, 3-6
2024-06-30vs Pham: Valley SouthwoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrooke Melott / Jeff Ditsworth vs Brent Hanson / Kim Gillum6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Stewart / David Fautsch vs Willow Bauer / Ayush Jha3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Whipps / Stephanie Anania vs Stephanie Bitner / Max Wilker0-6, 4-6
2024-06-23vs Pham: Valley SouthwoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesTony DAntuono / Calla Whipp vs Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf / Mike Sylvester2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Morgan / Katie Kelleher vs Jenn Willis / Martin Fisher Jr6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachel Morgan / Jordan Brackey vs Nathan Greiner / Leslie Shipp2-6, 2-6
2024-06-09vs Pham: Valley SouthwoodsLost 12
L#1 DoublesTim Paulson / Jessica Stewart vs Nathan Greiner / Jenn Willis4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCristen Schipper / Jordan Brackey vs Amanda Hilton / Ayush Jha6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Anania / David Fautsch vs Max Wilker / Stephanie Bitner6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed Tri-Level 7.0-8.0-9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Jordan Brackey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.13
Jeff Ditsworth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.12
Brooke Melott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.82
Angela Torgerson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Calla Whipp
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Jenn Smith
published
3.77
Siri Long
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
David Fautsch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Matthew Whipps
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Heather Ditsworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Cristen Schipper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Nathan Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Matthew Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Stephanie Anania
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rachel Morgan
published
Tim Paulson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tony DAntuono
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Johnston + Matthew Whipps6259% games+4.5% vs expected
Cristen Schipper + Heather Ditsworth404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Brackey
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.18
Jeff Ditsworth
47W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Brooke Melott
22W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Angela Torgerson
56W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Calla Whipp
41W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Jenn Smith
73W–34L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Siri Long
38W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.77
4
David Fautsch
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
Matthew Whipps
63W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Heather Ditsworth
60W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Cristen Schipper
69W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Nathan Johnston
57W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Matthew Morgan
40W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.58
Stephanie Anania
38W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Katie Kelleher
50W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Morgan
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Paulson
24W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tony DAntuono
22W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.