Teams

Lady Acers

2021 Prince George's Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-05-23vs Net Girlz LoVVWon 10
W#1 SinglesRachele Stines vs Claris Brock6-3, 6-4
2021-05-22vs Team ZimmermanLost 01
L#1 DoublesTrish Fulcher / Bobbie Garrison vs Karen Francis / Diem Salmon2-6, 3-6
2021-05-16Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRachele Stines vs Pamela Martin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-05-13vs Serving YouLost 02
L#1 DoublesTrish Fulcher / Denise Martin Barnes vs Kimberly Walker / Donna Garland6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachele Stines / Tiara McClain vs Sabra Szczyglowski / Gail Poole-Vaughn3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-05-01vs Team ZimmermanLost 01
L#1 DoublesRachele Stines / Elsie Stines vs Erica Cruickshank / Kim Chamberlain2-6, 1-6
2021-04-28vs Team ZimmermanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRebecca Sellassie / Rachele Stines vs Kim Chamberlain / Claudia Hernandez2-2
L#2 DoublesDenise Martin Barnes / Trish Fulcher vs Anna McLean / Karen Francis6-7, 6-7
2021-04-25vs Different StrokesLost 01
L#1 DoublesTrish Fulcher / Tiara McClain vs Dannielle Freeman / Jessica Bynum2-6, 0-6
2021-04-18vs Serving YouLost 01
L#1 DoublesRachele Stines / Denise Martin Barnes vs Gail Poole-Vaughn / Sabra Szczyglowski2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2021-04-17vs Net Girlz LoVVWon 10
W#2 DoublesTiara McClain / Trish Fulcher vs Michelle Johnson / Terri Windsor7-6, 6-4
2021-04-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElsie Stines / Rachele Stines vs Ozell Cooper / Barbara Miller6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Tiara McClain
published
3.42
Cynthia Rapp
published 3.5
3.22
3.17
Shirin Ahmed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.95
Rachele Stines
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.88
Karen Casey
published
2.85
Trish Fulcher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Bobbie Garrison
published 3
2.72
Elsie Stines
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiara McClain
37W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Cynthia Rapp
36W–30L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Denise Martin Barnes
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Shirin Ahmed
198W–134L career · 4 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Rebecca Sellassie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Rachele Stines
165W–138L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%65%35%
2.95
Karen Casey
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Trish Fulcher
41W–71L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Diana Williams Gibau
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Bobbie Garrison
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Elsie Stines
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.