Teams

Randall/Weidlein DAY

2025 South East Tennis Combo 55 & over · Women 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-20vs McKenna/Doer DAYWon 21
W#1 DoublesClarke Weidlein / Sabrina Nikel vs Dianne McKenna / Sheryl Doerr6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Barry / Lisa Toomey vs Donna Robinson / Luanne Basile6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnn Schuelke / Karen O'Connor vs Janet Harbeck / Paula Bachman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-11vs Davidson 55+Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLynn Norris / Susan Barry vs Shelley Boehling / Donna Jaeckel6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLisa Toomey / Lois Randall vs Betty Mahoney / Maureen Fehrs3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMarlene Fricano / Ann Schuelke vs Denise Vliet / Sarah McKenzie2-6, 2-6
2025-09-27vs Bowen/HartWon 21
W#1 DoublesClarke Weidlein / Jennifer Hartnett vs Lorraine Lee / Ghilaine Dallaire6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Wilson / Tara MacCall vs Cheryl Maddux / Jo Ellen Myers6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren O'Connor / Lisa Toomey vs Laura Bowen / Judy Hoell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-24vs Roberson/Kunze (Day)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hartnett / Susan Wilson vs Margaret Coco / Diana Messier5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLynn Norris / Kathleen Murphy vs Margaret Varga-Roberson / Kathleen Kunze7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesClarke Weidlein / Tara MacCall vs Kathleen Hawkins / Diane Thorne6-3, 6-2
2025-09-17vs Welch-McCallLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynn Norris / Lois Randall vs Catherine McCall / Kelly Ochsner3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathleen Murphy / Phyllis Sheets vs Jamie Lanzi / Jean Robbins5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarlene Fricano / Clarke Weidlein vs Kendall Welch / Debra Walters2-6, 6-7
2025-09-13vs Adams 7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Gick / Lynn Norris vs Linda McKinney / Debbie Trafton3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSabrina Nikel / Lisa Toomey vs Kim Morris / Shameena Broach7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarlene Fricano / Karen O'Connor vs Anne Milkes / Patti Sizemore0-6, 1-6
2025-09-09vs Richard/BrownfieldLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Barry / Lois Randall vs Karen Wall / Beth OConnor6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Wilson / Ann Schuelke vs Peggy O'Connell / Joan Proctor2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTara MacCall / Lisa Toomey vs Catherine Richard / Lisa Williamson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-08vs Tatum 7.5 - 55sWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Norris / Lois Randall vs Kathleen Glancy / Linda Haller6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Barry / Kathleen Murphy vs Cara DAngelo / Julianne Assad6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJennifer Gick / Phyllis Sheets vs Leslie Seidel / Eileen Hendrick6-2, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jennifer Hartnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Lynn Norris
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
Lois Randall
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.39
Phyllis Sheets
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Ann Schuelke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Clarke Weidlein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Lisa Toomey
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.20
Tara MacCall
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.18
Jennifer Gick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.05
Marlene Fricano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Karen O'Connor
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.97
Kathleen Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Sabrina Nikel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Barry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Gick + Kathleen Murphy134 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Murphy + Tara MacCall314 matchesnot enough data
Clarke Weidlein + Tara MacCall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hartnett
18W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Lynn Norris
9W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Lois Randall
6W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Phyllis Sheets
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Ann Schuelke
7W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Clarke Weidlein
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Lisa Toomey
13W–9L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Tara MacCall
20W–9L career · 9 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Jennifer Gick
7W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Marlene Fricano
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Karen O'Connor
6W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Kathleen Murphy
14W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Sabrina Nikel
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Barry
36W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.