← Teams

CGM-Rushall

2020 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 4.08 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Matthew Condit
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.95
Thomas McGirk
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
—
Everett Frank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Susan Ford
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Gale Volk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 0
—
Takumi Koyama
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results11 ties
2020-03-01Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJustin Carrier / Takumi Koyama vs Amy Leahy / Brian Leahy6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesThomas McGirk / Michi VanGrunsven vs Bo Johnson / Brooke Burnett6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesQuang Pham / Susan Ford vs Frank Lippy / Annie Duong6-0, 6-1
2020-02-22Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMatthew Condit / Gale Volk vs Brent Waddle / Julie Atchley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas McGirk / Cindy Rushall vs Minou Chau / James Feeney6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEverett Frank / Lisa Provost vs Mike Mon / Rebecca Jacobs6-0, 6-0
2020-02-21Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesJoshuah Kleiva / Cindy Rushall vs Zachary Kinavey / Carrie Putsch6-3, 5-3
2020-02-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesGale Volk / Matthew Condit vs Jim Rankin / Rebecca Redding - *2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Ford / Quang Pham vs Michael Sather / Jill Sather6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichi VanGrunsven / Thomas McGirk vs Renato Bernasconi Zuccari / Coral Nash3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2020-02-15Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesJake Dawes / Cindy Rushall vs Agus Rusli / Donna Kennish6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2020-02-09Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesCindy Rushall / Ben Yamaguchi vs Misuzu Komine / Keisuke Komine6-4, 6-0
2020-02-07Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesQuang Pham / Susan Ford vs Amanda Solomon / Steve Bidwell6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCindy Rushall / Thomas McGirk vs Jaap Sparrius / Tanya O'Neil6-2, 6-2
2020-01-26Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSusan Ford / Quang Pham vs Colin Arnold / Honghui Liang7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMatthew Condit / Cindy Rushall vs Sydney Taggart / Reynaldo Anglin6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesEverett Frank / Lisa Provost vs Shawn Yu / Patricia Evola6-3, 6-3
2020-01-18Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJustin Carrier / Takumi Koyama vs Steve Bolstad / Julie Bryan Maack6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Condit / Gale Volk vs Yascha Noonberg / Cindy Nordlund6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEverett Frank / Lisa Provost vs Kelly Branson / David Kabaker7-5, 6-4
2020-01-05Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesQuang Pham / Susan Ford vs Patrick Trank / Raini Spitze6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMatthew Condit / Gale Volk vs Bonnie Sidoff / Brian Dehen6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas McGirk / Cindy Rushall vs William Anderson / Linda Anderson6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2020-01-05Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesThomas Hutley / Cindy Rushall vs Christy Strange / Jason Ruhmann6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Matthew Condit
26W–56L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Thomas McGirk
56W–73L career
25%75%0%
3.95
4
Everett Frank
32W–64L career
not enough data
—
4
Susan Ford
38W–107L career · type S
11%89%0%
3.61
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09
0
Gale Volk
15W–21L career
not enough data
—
0
Takumi Koyama
47W–24L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.