Teams

Laredo Women's 3.0 Carvalho

Adult 18 & Over League · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.20 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-22vs Laredo Women's 3.0 De LunaWon 50
W#1 DoublesAndrea Gallegos / Ana Alvarez vs GABRIELA de LUNA / Amelie Jane6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAlejandra Pena vs Mayela Saad6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRoxanna Muzza / Monica Acasuso vs Raquel Gomez / Olivia Gonzalez7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesPaulina Vega Gonzalez vs Mirian Mendoza6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSELINA TREVINO / Gabriela Tawil vs Brenda Santos / Sara Salido6-0, 6-1
2026-05-19vs Laredo Women's 3.0 De LunaWon 40
W#1 DoublesSELINA TREVINO / Paulina Vega Gonzalez vs Minerva Santos / Mirian Mendoza6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAmanda Barto vs Brenda Santos6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAna Alvarez / Sara Lascari vs Olivia Gonzalez / Raquel Gomez5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMaria Diez vs Sara Salido6-1, 6-4
2026-05-17vs Laredo Women's 3.0 De LunaWon 40
W#1 DoublesMonica Acasuso / SELINA TREVINO vs Yvonne Casso / Mirian Mendoza6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAlejandra Pena vs Brenda Santos6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRoxanna Muzza / Sara Lascari vs GABRIELA de LUNA / Daniella Sada Paz6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGabriela Tawil / Andrea Gallegos vs Elsa Pena / Minerva Santos6-0, 6-0
2026-05-14vs Laredo Women's 3.0 De LunaWon 40
W#1 DoublesSara Lascari / Ana Alvarez vs Olivia Gonzalez / GABRIELA de LUNA6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesPaulina Vega Gonzalez vs Brenda Santos6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAmanda Barto vs Mirian Mendoza6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaria Diez / Roxanna Muzza vs Daniella Sada Paz / Elsa Pena6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Cledson Carvalho
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.09
Alejandra Pena
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.87
Paulina Vega Gonzalez
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.81
SELINA TREVINO
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Amanda Barto
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Andrea Gallegos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Sara Lascari
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.66
Ana Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Maria Diez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.62
Monica Acasuso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Gabriela Tawil
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roxanna Gonzalez Muzza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Diez + Roxanna Gonzalez Muzza224 matchesnot enough data
Gabriela Tawil + Andrea Gallegos224 matchesnot enough data
Ana Alvarez + Andrea Gallegos303 matchesnot enough data
Monica Acasuso + SELINA TREVINO213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cledson Carvalho
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
3
Alejandra Pena
13W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.09
Paulina Vega Gonzalez
7W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
SELINA TREVINO
15W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Amanda Barto
12W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Andrea Gallegos
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Lascari
12W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Ana Alvarez
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Maria Diez
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Monica Acasuso
6W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Gabriela Tawil
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roxanna Gonzalez Muzza
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.