Teams

SSLT BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-01vs WC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBen Edmonds / Bob Louden vs Michael Carroll / STEPHEN BROWN4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAntony Chandy vs Michael Doherty6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBob Datson / Dan Lobb vs Raul Uribe / Billy Robbins0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Parsons / Rich Marks vs Jim Ginsburg / Walt Curtner7-6, 6-2
2021-05-25vs CACI GREENWon 41
W#1 DoublesBob Louden / Steven Huffman vs Jim Donald / Jon Wright6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesBen Edmonds vs William Alquist6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBob Datson / Dan Lobb vs Karl Ewald / Rich Murri7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAntony Chandy vs Daniel Curtis7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRich Marks / Steve Bocher vs John Cranston / Norbert Frueh6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-18vs PRC NAVYLost 23
L#1 DoublesBob Louden / Charles Parsons vs Eric Olsen-Dufour / Paul Hemann2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBen Edmonds vs Tyus Muklebust1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBob Datson / Steven Huffman vs John Wierzba / Jeremy Mayoss5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDan Lobb vs Pat Conroy0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRich Marks / Richard Holt vs Jeffrey Davis / Jim Farrar2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-05-11vs HV BLACKWon 40
W#1 SinglesAntony Chandy vs Jamie Kennedy6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBob Louden / Steven Huffman vs Mark Figley / Jason Reinking6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBen Edmonds vs Peter Sjoberg6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteve Bocher / Rich Marks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-04vs HW GREENWon 50
W#1 DoublesBob Louden / Antony Chandy vs Ian Parsons / Travis Middlebrooks6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBen Edmonds vs JAY PARKS6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBob Datson / Charles Parsons vs Steve Serenyi / Sean Clancy7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDan Lobb vs Brian Francis6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRichard Holt / David Norvell vs Ross King / Bruce Thorne6-4, 6-2
2021-04-27vs CPV REDLost 05
L#1 DoublesSteven Huffman / Steve Bocher vs Christopher Huser / Jonathan Landis0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBen Edmonds vs Alexis Tibar5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Parsons / David Norvell vs Stephen Jenks / Chad Williams4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDan Lobb vs Tony Hildebrand2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBob Datson / Rich Marks vs Michael Shorts / Kevin Kroeker7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2021-04-20vs HRCA NAVYWon 31
L#1 DoublesDan Lobb / Bob Louden vs Tom Haensel / Daniel Bruetting4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesBen Edmonds vs Brandon Dale7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAntony Chandy / Steven Huffman vs John Guzak / John Medberry6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRichard Holt / Charles Parsons vs Ken Kaiser / William Hunzicker7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Antony Chandy
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.43
Ben Edmonds
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Charles Parsons
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Bob Louden
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.93
Dan Lobb
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Rich Marks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bob Datson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
David Norvell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Steve Bocher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Steven Huffman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Lobb + Ben Edmonds3250% games+2.0% vs expected
Steven Huffman + Bob Louden3246% games−3.8% vs expected
Bob Louden + Ben Edmonds2349% gamesnot enough data
Bob Datson + Steven Huffman044 matchesnot enough data
Bob Louden + Charles Parsons044 matchesnot enough data
Steven Huffman + Charles Parsons033 matchesnot enough data
Dan Lobb + Rich Marks033 matchesnot enough data
Steve Bocher + Rich Marks123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Antony Chandy
13W–4L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Ben Edmonds
49W–30L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Charles Parsons
10W–28L career · type S · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Bob Louden
46W–34L career · 6 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Dan Lobb
18W–49L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Rich Marks
36W–74L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Bob Datson
4W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
David Norvell
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Bocher
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Steven Huffman
5W–21L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.