Teams

Pershing-Rancheros

Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.71 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesMichelle Adam / Patricia English vs Bina Ahmed / KC Collins2-6, 0-6
2024-08-10vs LCCC-Slice GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlicia Linquiti / Rachael Stein vs Lauren Katz / Jeanne Salts6-4, 7-6
2024-07-20vs SBTC-TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Adam / Beth Ford vs Julie Rosenthal / Amy Jakobson6-0, 6-3
2024-07-20vs LCCC-Slice GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlicia Linquiti / Yin Segalman vs Jeanne Salts / BETH MAGID1-6, 2-6
2024-07-06vs SBTC-TriLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlicia Linquiti / Patricia English vs Heather Reed / Julie Rosenthal4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Beth Ford
published 4
3.89
Cassie Campbell
published 4
3.58
Alicia Linquiti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Michelle Adam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Jen Haskell
published
3.48
Lisa Daley
published
3.40
Sherry Holland
published
3.34
Joann Hollingshead
published
3.25
Brianna Decker
published 3.5
3.22
Jaime Dejong
published
3.22
Walden Bohnet
published 3.5
3.19
Patricia English
published
3.09
Susan Lemon
published
Bella Decker
published 3
2.73
Susan Bender
published
Maribel Orozco
published
Rachael Stein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Walden Bohnet + Lisa Daley2346% games+3.5% vs expected
Alicia Linquiti + Joann Hollingshead3742% games+2.1% vs expected
Patricia English + Alicia Linquiti4148% gamesnot enough data
Patricia English + Joann Hollingshead033 matchesnot enough data
Jen Haskell + Cassie Campbell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Ford
89W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Cassie Campbell
24W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Alicia Linquiti
91W–67L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.58
4
Michelle Adam
67W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
Jen Haskell
22W–21L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
Lisa Daley
22W–14L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Sherry Holland
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Joann Hollingshead
12W–34L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.34
3.5
Brianna Decker
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Jaime Dejong
26W–32L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Walden Bohnet
78W–92L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Patricia English
28W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.19
Susan Lemon
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Bella Decker
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Bender
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.73
Maribel Orozco
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachael Stein
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.