Teams

Tipton/Mendoza/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-09vs Smead/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Giraudo / Paula Cutter vs Renee Trent / Angela Rae Rhody6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAshley Tipton vs Wyeshia Edwards6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKetki Sheth / Keri Brill vs Rhonda Mann / Dawn Duke6-3, 6-3
2026-04-21vs Waide/Smith/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Tipton / Anna Goethals vs LeAnn Waide / Alaina Smith6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKetki Sheth / Cheri Arnsdorff vs Hollie Smith / Jennifer Parkhurst6-1, 6-1
2026-04-18vs Waide/Smith/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheri Arnsdorff / Jennifer Mendoza vs Jennifer Parkhurst / Jamie Iverson6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAnna Goethals vs LeAnn Waide6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKeri Brill / Andrea Giraudo vs Alaina Smith / Lesli Lowry2-6, 4-6
2026-04-04vs Smead/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheri Arnsdorff / Jennifer Mendoza vs Angela Rae Rhody / Dawn Duke6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAndrea Giraudo vs Wyeshia Edwards1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Tipton / Paula Cutter vs Martha Filipkowski / Jana Dovgan6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Anna Goethals
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.64
Paula Cutter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Jennifer Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.38
Ashley Tipton
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.36
Cheri Arnsdorff
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.31
Ketki Sheth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.29
Keri Brill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Andrea Giraudo
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheri Arnsdorff + Jennifer Mendoza8271% games+16.4% vs expected
Ashley Tipton + Paula Cutter4261% games+15.1% vs expected
Cheri Arnsdorff + Paula Cutter5071% games+14.2% vs expected
Cheri Arnsdorff + Ketki Sheth4155% games+10.1% vs expected
Ashley Tipton + Jennifer Mendoza3246% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Tipton + Andrea Giraudo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anna Goethals
7W–2L career · type D · 6 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Paula Cutter
23W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%14%86%
2.64
Jennifer Mendoza
33W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%45%55%
2.52
2.5
Ashley Tipton
22W–28L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
Cheri Arnsdorff
33W–28L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
Ketki Sheth
18W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
Keri Brill
16W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Andrea Giraudo
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.