Teams

Oak Creek/Bazan M4.0

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT M Saturday · M4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.10 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-17vs LifeTime Plano/Llambias-Nair M4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesSumesh Chopra / Prithvi Reddy vs Glenn Henderson / Robert Cox4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesManuel Lopez / Sumesh Chopra vs Dan Cordales / Calvin McDonald2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-17vs MacArthur HS/Movva-Selvaraj M4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesMohan Vasa / Sumesh Chopra vs Kumarandurai Selvaraj / Raj Movva6-0, 6-0
2024-02-03vs Lakes/Flanagan M4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesChad Carlquist / Sumesh Chopra vs Blake Beavers / Blake Haydon6-1, 7-5
2024-02-01vs Huffhines/McDonald-Clark M4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSumesh Chopra / Geof Ferfort vs Vinhthuy Nguyen / Chris Pepple3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesGeof Ferfort / Sumesh Chopra vs Glenn Flora / Scott Russell6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Sumesh Chopra
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.94
Atul Rajani
published 4
3.94
3.90
Steven Riddle
published
3.85
Geof Ferfort
published
Chad Carlquist
published 4
3.72
3.68
Mohan Vasa
published
3.62
Jack Chang
published
3.48
Cary Bazan
published 4
Keith Robinson
published
Pin Suew Ng
published
Scott Kim
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sumesh Chopra
90W–62L career · 6 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Atul Rajani
27W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.94
Muralikrishnan Shanmugam
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Steven Riddle
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
Geof Ferfort
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.85
4
Chad Carlquist
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Debashish Baishyantri
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Mohan Vasa
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Jack Chang
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.62
4
Cary Bazan
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Keith Robinson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pin Suew Ng
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Kim
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.