Teams

Jonesville - Cribb

2022 Alachua Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.30 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-28vs ALACHUA/MolyneuxLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Cribb / Eric Esterline vs Heather Gibson / David Hou6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJohn Walt Boatright / Jennine Brandt vs MEGAN MOLYNEUX / Cameron Slack1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRupen Shah / Lindsey Wilson vs Hadleigh Green / Donald Blair0-3
2022-08-27vs ALACHUA/MolyneuxLost 01
L#2 DoublesRoy Cribb / Courtney Woody vs Cameron Slack / MEGAN MOLYNEUX3-6, 2-6
2022-08-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Brandt / Jennine Brandt vs MEGAN MOLYNEUX / Harrison Thibault7-6, 7-5
2022-08-21vs ALACHUA/MolyneuxLost 01
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Brandt / Jennine Brandt vs Harrison Thibault / Kelly Banes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-07vs ALACHUA/MolyneuxSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAubrey Hall / John Lear vs Vincent LoCascio / Hadleigh Green1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Fuller / Rupen Shah vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-31vs ALACHUA/MolyneuxWon 20
W#2 DoublesEric Esterline / Mary Cribb vs Cynthia Thibault / Harrison Thibault3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCourtney Woody / Roy Cribb vs Corey Sobers / Emily Dace2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Alejandro Pauly
published 4.5
4.25
Eric Esterline
published 4.5
Courtney Woody
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.72
Roy Cribb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
John Lear
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Rupen Shah
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Kannika Torres
published
3.08
Jigisha Shah
published
Jennine Brandt
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Lindsey Wilson
published
Mary Cribb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roy Cribb + Mary Cribb5255% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cribb + Rupen Shah1438% gamesnot enough data
Jigisha Shah + Eric Esterline134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alejandro Pauly
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Eric Esterline
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Courtney Woody
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Roy Cribb
46W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
John Lear
66W–84L career · 1 line in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Rupen Shah
201W–161L career · 8 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Kannika Torres
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Jigisha Shah
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jennine Brandt
77W–116L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindsey Wilson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Cribb
34W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.