← Teams

STAC Wallace 4.5+W

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5+ Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Huong Lakin
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
—
Lisa Gray
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
3.76
Angela Keck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.22
Michelle O'Neil
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
—
Theresa Helland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 0
Results17 ties
2019-06-30Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesLisa Gray / Cathi Peck vs Lisa Klein / Honghui Liang6-1, 7-5
2019-06-29Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesLisa Gray / Cathi Peck vs Cathy Valentine / Launi Smith6-2, 6-0
2019-06-22Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesCathi Peck / Lisa Gray vs Michelle Donato / Alexandra van Hoy2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-06-16Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLisa Gray / Cathi Peck vs Xia Wu / Sue Gregoire6-1, 7-5
2019-06-15Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesCathi Peck / Lisa Gray vs Shannon Fraser / Andrea Cunningham1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-06-01Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesLisa Gray / Cathi Peck vs Noriko Satake / Donna Roisom6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2019-05-17Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesCarol Woolman / Lisa Gray vs Mari Mitchelson / Trina Denson6-3, 6-4
2019-03-16Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Helland / Sally Harn vs Camilla George / Jessie Tzeng4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2019-03-02Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesSally Harn / Theresa Helland vs Edie Hall / Sarah Schodde6-2, 7-5
2019-02-17Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesSally Harn / Theresa Helland vs Dianne Discolo / Yuka Kimura4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2019-01-06Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTheresa Helland / Sally Harn vs Mary Beaumont / Tonya Whitlock6-2, 6-4
2018-12-08Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesSally Harn / Theresa Helland vs Beth Perrow / Betsy Skevington6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAngela Keck vs Shana Curran6-0, 6-2
2018-11-17Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesSally Harn / Theresa Helland vs Mary Hougan / Kenna Canaan6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesHuong Lakin vs Rebecca Stapp6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesApril Gentry / Lisa Gray vs Bonnie Wood / Colleen Sharkey6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAngela Keck / Mary Guptill vs Laurie Giebelhaus / Linda Berghoff6-1, 6-3
2018-11-11Won 2–1
L#2 DoublesLisa Gray / April Gentry vs Beth Perrow / Betsy Skevington1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHuong Lakin vs Sachiko Ishihara-Spray6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle O'Neil / Reva Wallace vs Patricia Dorsey / Michelle Harris7-6, 6-4
2018-10-06Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesTami Davis / Theresa Helland vs Cathy Healy / Colleen Sharkey6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichelle O'Neil vs Ilene Stohl6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesHuong Lakin vs Bonnie Wood6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Gray / Reva Wallace vs Laurie Giebelhaus / Melanie Redding6-2, 6-0
2018-09-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSally Harn / Theresa Helland vs Michelle Harris / Dena Snow6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHuong Lakin vs Shana Curran6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAngela Keck / Reva Wallace vs Michelle Fladebo / Sally Devine Wright6-0, 6-4
2018-09-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPaula Moll / Michelle O'Neil vs Mary Hougan / Patty Kilmer6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHuong Lakin vs Colleen Sharkey6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesReva Wallace / Lisa Gray vs Bonnie Wood / Laurie Giebelhaus6-1, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Huong Lakin
11W–3L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Lisa Gray
90W–56L career
not enough data
—
4
Angela Keck
80W–104L career
0%99%0%
3.76
4
Michelle O'Neil
69W–73L career
95%5%0%
3.22
0
Theresa Helland
78W–34L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.