Teams

Team 4 Net Assets

2025 NOVA Singles · NOVA Singles 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.29 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-30vs Team 7 ChallengersWon 10
W#1 SinglesRiley Huffer vs Yong Cao6-1, 6-4
2025-10-24vs Team 5 Smashers 2000Won 10
W#2 SinglesFrederic Colas vs Sai Chindepalli6-1, 6-1
2025-10-11vs Team 1 CourtmastersWon 10
W#3 SinglesJustin Dorsk vs Daniel Mamani6-3, 6-2
2025-10-05vs Team 6 Z's Last Chance SaloonSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJustin Dorsk vs Jordan Glashow6-2, 5-3
L#3 SinglesFrederic Colas vs William Wray3-6, 3-4
2025-09-26vs Team 2 Who Is We? EvolutionWon 10
W#3 SinglesRiley Huffer vs Jesse Cebulash6-2, 6-4
2025-09-20vs Team 7 ChallengersWon 10
W#1 SinglesRiley Huffer vs Yong Cao6-1, 6-3
2025-09-11vs Team 5 Smashers 2000Won 20
W#1 SinglesRiley Huffer vs Scott Jacob7-5, 5-4
W#2 SinglesJustin Dorsk vs Aaron Ohmer6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Conner Healy
published 4.5
4.20
Riley Huffer
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Brad Ziajor
published 4.5
4.13
Brendon Smith
published 4
3.98
Josh Safran
published
3.97
Nick Yang
published
3.95
Justin Dorsk
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Aaron Blackmon
published 4
3.77
Frederic Colas
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.26
Sharif Charles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Dorsk + Frederic Colas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Conner Healy
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Riley Huffer
56W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Brad Ziajor
65W–56L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Brendon Smith
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.13
Josh Safran
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Nick Yang
31W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4.5
Justin Dorsk
126W–83L career · 6 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Aaron Blackmon
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Frederic Colas
180W–150L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Sharif Charles
34W–24L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.