Teams

Motichek 40/3.5/M/Pelican

2026 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-02-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJason Landry / Steven Toups vs Ross Doyle / Ronald Santos4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
David Oubre
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.22
Ellis Iverson
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Alan Schluter
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Jarrod Sullivan
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Jason Landry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jason Ortis
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kenny Boudreaux
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lou Bonnett
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Ronnie Cazabon
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Shane Hatler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steven Toups
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Travis Motichek
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published
Wayne Songy
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Schluter + Jason Ortis134 matchesnot enough data
Ronnie Cazabon + Kenny Boudreaux033 matchesnot enough data
Jarrod Sullivan + Jason Landry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Oubre
7W–11L career · 11 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ellis Iverson
4W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Alan Schluter
14W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Jarrod Sullivan
0W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jason Landry
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jason Ortis
16W–34L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kenny Boudreaux
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lou Bonnett
3W–9L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ronnie Cazabon
4W–25L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shane Hatler
6W–6L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Toups
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Travis Motichek
17W–29L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wayne Songy
12W–22L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.