Teams

CSRC THORNTON

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-10vs CCW WARDWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnnette Markert / Julie Haynie vs Victoria Walker / Maggie Ward6-2, 6-3
2024-06-03vs CSRC MCCLENDONWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Wisner / Sue Arntzen vs Susan Anderson / Martha Walker5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-20vs CCOC MARKWon 10
W#2 DoublesJane Wisner / Linda Edgar vs Carol Joslin / Suzanne Book6-2, 6-2
2024-05-06vs CCW WARDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Haynie / Sue Arntzen vs Shelly Shepard / Kristi Couture6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-29vs CCOC MARKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnnette Markert / Julie Haynie vs Jane Ridings / Carol Presicci6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJane Wisner / Linda Edgar vs Carol Joslin / Allison Johnson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Julie Haynie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Annette Markert
published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Carpenter
published
3.16
Sue Arntzen
published
3.12
Jane Wisner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Linda Edgar
published
3.02
Sara Callender
published
2.97
Vicki Gess
published 3
Julie Thornton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Wisner + Linda Edgar12951% games−10.9% vs expected
Sara Callender + Sue Arntzen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Julie Haynie
22W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Annette Markert
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Carpenter
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Sue Arntzen
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Jane Wisner
89W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Linda Edgar
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Sara Callender
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02
3
Vicki Gess
53W–56L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Julie Thornton
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.