Teams

GSTL 3.5M 55 & Over (Swartling)

2026 Mixed 55 & Over- GSTL · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-20vs GSTL55/Lane/StablesWon 30
W#1 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / Annette Graham vs Leroy Scott Washington / Julie Pope6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMesanie Lee / Terry Walden vs Keith Wilcox / Beth Baxley6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKaren Swartling / Craig Fischer vs Doug Costin / Glenn Wilcox6-1, 6-2
2026-07-16vs GSTL55/Henderson/StablesWon 30
W#1 DoublesTerry Walden / Mesanie Lee vs Belinda Foster / Bruce Bailey6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / Leslie Thomas vs Kimberly Leatherwood / Paul Kenny6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Babyak / Debbie Michnowicz vs Barbara Sullivan / John Ahearn6-1, 6-0
2026-07-13vs GSTL55/Collins/DunesWon 21
W#1 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / Annette Graham vs Shai Kahn / Charles Gary Barros6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRichard Babyak / Mesanie Lee vs James Johnson / Katie Sandoz6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Swartling / Terry Walden vs Tom Collins / Becky Walls2-6, 3-6
2026-06-29vs GSTL55/Beazley/RLTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Swartling / Terry Walden vs Cecil Ugarte / Tonya Fitzgerald6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / Annette Graham vs Doug Beazley / Cheri McLeod6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Babyak / Mesanie Lee vs Sergio Lorenzo / Diane Markham6-2, 6-2
2026-06-15vs GSTL55/Lane/StablesWon 30
W#1 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / Annette Graham vs Linda Lane / Leroy Scott Washington6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Babyak / Mesanie Lee vs Doug Costin / Kelly Cox4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTerry Walden / Debbie Michnowicz vs Teri Guyer / Willis Jowers6-3, 6-0
2026-06-08vs GSTL55/Collins/DunesLost 03
L#1 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / Annette Graham vs Becky Walls / Robert Farrar6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Babyak / Kim Thomas vs Katie Sandoz / John Charles Sandoz2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeslie Thomas / Terry Walden vs Myla Butler / Charles Gary Barros5-7, 3-6
2026-06-01vs GSTL55/Henderson/StablesWon 30
W#1 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / Annette Graham vs Ted Newman / Brenda Curtin6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRoberto Ferraro / Leslie Thomas vs Mark Talbot / Lynda Carter6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRichard Babyak / Mesanie Lee vs Richard Conaway / Kathy Henderson6-2, 6-0
2026-05-18vs GSTL55/Beazley/RLTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / Annette Graham vs Doug Beazley / Cheri McLeod6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Swartling / Terry Walden vs Scott Leroux / Lisa Leroux6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRichard Babyak / Mesanie Lee vs Sergio Lorenzo / Diane Markham6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GSTL 3.5M 55 & Over (Swartling)7119513142
2GSTL55/Collins/Dunes5317720199
3GSTL55/Lane/Stables53131128213
4GSTL55/Beazley/RLTC35101432221
5GSTL55/Henderson/Stables0812346282

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Craig Fischer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Richard Babyak
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.28
Karen Swartling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Annette Graham
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.25
ROB SAPPENFIELD
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Mesanie Lee
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.07
Terry Walden
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.06
Diana Morgan
published 3.5
3.00
Roberto Ferraro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Debbie Michnowicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annette Graham + ROB SAPPENFIELD9165% games+20.3% vs expected
Mesanie Lee + Richard Babyak5162% gamesnot enough data
Terry Walden + Mesanie Lee314 matchesnot enough data
Terry Walden + Karen Swartling224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Craig Fischer
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Richard Babyak
15W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Karen Swartling
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Annette Graham
27W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
ROB SAPPENFIELD
31W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.25
Mesanie Lee
24W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Terry Walden
27W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
3.5
Diana Morgan
53W–74L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
Roberto Ferraro
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3.5
Debbie Michnowicz
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.