Teams

Hansen

2022 18&Over Men Manhattan · 5.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 5.00 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-26vs PetersenWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatt Hansen / Andrew Herring vs Ethan Bogard / Colin Nardella6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDaniel Barrus vs Bryant Born6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPatriek Wolterbeek / Carl Lundberg vs Graham Lehman / Christopher Auteri5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-03vs Eastern/El-Haj Ahmad/18&Over5.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatt Hansen / Zachary Krumholz vs Adam Joyce / James Russell7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristian Perez vs Sam Burns0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Ha / Bryan Haywood vs Matthew Demichiel / Jeffrey Lawrence1-6, 2-6
2022-05-08vs PetersenWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Herring / Erik Strong vs Colin Nardella / Sven Kranz7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDaniel Barrus vs Bryant Born6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatriek Wolterbeek / Carl Lundberg vs Kevin Rothstein / Marc Sable6-1, 6-2
2022-04-08vs Eastern/El-Haj Ahmad/18&Over5.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatt Hansen / Andrew Herring vs Adam Joyce / Jeffrey Lawrence6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesErik Strong vs Loic Minery2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPatriek Wolterbeek / Wesley Maddox vs Mohammad El-Haj Ahmad / Brian Untch6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.78 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.84
Wesley Maddox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Herring
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Carl Lundberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Christian Perez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.71
Kevin Ha
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Bryan Haywood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Barrus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Erik Strong
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Matt Hansen
published
Patriek Wolterbeek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Zachary Krumholz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patriek Wolterbeek + Carl Lundberg4164% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Herring + Matt Hansen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wesley Maddox
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%89%10%
4.84
5
Andrew Herring
24W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Carl Lundberg
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Christian Perez
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Ha
31W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%1%
4.71
Bryan Haywood
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Daniel Barrus
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Erik Strong
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matt Hansen
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patriek Wolterbeek
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Zachary Krumholz
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.