Teams

Pinellas/Price

2022 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekend · 3.0 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-18vs ELW AnkneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Price / Elizabeth Jordan vs Kimberly Ankney / Robyn Houston6-3, 6-0
2022-06-11Split 11
W#1 DoublesMaggie Berning / Sue Francis vs Robyn Crane / Dory Tiesler4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHellen Davis / Moise Carrington vs Judy Carlin / Lucie Pristow1-6, 2-6
2022-06-04vs ELW AnkneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Price / Sally Blush vs Martha Cornatzer / Lee Cucchi6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Frances Skinner6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-21vs Countryside SolaWon 10
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Betsy Rutkowski6-0, 6-4
2022-05-14vs SPTC BernishWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Jordan / Christine Price vs Melissa Wirt / Chris Pruett7-5, 6-4
2022-05-07vs Countryside DunnWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Price / Sue Francis vs Daspina Malasky / Aidsha Pastrana6-2, 6-1
2022-04-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesChristine Price / Maggie Berning vs Laura Baker / Dory Tiesler6-3, 6-1
2022-04-16vs Countryside SolaWon 10
W#3 DoublesHellen Davis / Maggie Berning vs Diane Gordon / Julie Kalter6-1, 6-1
2022-04-09vs SPTC BernishLost 01
L#3 DoublesMoise Carrington / Hellen Davis vs Rima Terradista / Bobbi-Jo Willett6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-02vs Countryside DunnWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Price / Elizabeth Jordan vs Anne Marie Lennox / Marisol Cohen7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Kimberly Kurey6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Moise Carrington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Sally Blush
published
3.08
Sue Francis
published
3.04
Maggie Berning
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.02
Christine Price
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Erica Allums
published 3
2.81
Asheley Wardell
published 3
2.62
Patty Anderson
published
2.48
Sonia Agee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Berning + Christine Price314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Moise Carrington
67W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Sally Blush
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Sue Francis
2W–15L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Maggie Berning
50W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Christine Price
99W–86L career · 8 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Erica Allums
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Asheley Wardell
9W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
Patty Anderson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Sonia Agee
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.