Teams

WPAFB-Honore

2023 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2023 Winter A18&O 3.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.43 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2023 Winter A18&O 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Christopher Sigler
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.33
Gregory Noechel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Nelson Gabriel
published
David Iden
published 3.5
3.13
Matthew Hobbs
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Ed Honore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Claudio Bellini
published 3.5
2.91
Josh Steck
published
Haden Gregory
published 3
2.63
Douglas Coy
published 3
George Hagan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
John Manovich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Bernhardt
published
Thomas Severyn
published
Thusitha Gunasekera
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tony Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ed Honore + Nelson Gabriel9559% games+7.1% vs expected
George Hagan + Nelson Gabriel1538% games+0.1% vs expected
Tony Brown + Ed Honore3248% games−0.5% vs expected
George Hagan + Tony Brown5546% games−3.5% vs expected
Nelson Gabriel + Claudio Bellini1938% games−4.3% vs expected
David Iden + Nelson Gabriel2446% gamesnot enough data
Josh Steck + Claudio Bellini1442% gamesnot enough data
Tony Brown + Thomas Bernhardt044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Sigler
37W–53L career · 7 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Gregory Noechel
23W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Nelson Gabriel
33W–69L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
David Iden
5W–43L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Hobbs
11W–41L career · 9 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Ed Honore
37W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Claudio Bellini
24W–99L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98
Josh Steck
13W–42L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Haden Gregory
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Douglas Coy
44W–69L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
2.63
George Hagan
9W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Manovich
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Bernhardt
23W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Severyn
4W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thusitha Gunasekera
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tony Brown
14W–34L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.