Teams

20 Southampton Brown

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-06vs 19 Burkwood ClarkWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Jones / Beth Morris vs Modestine Carter / Mary Ann Cox4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-04vs 2 ACAC Naylor/HoeferLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Jones / Beth Morris vs Julie Rison / Tatiana Smirnov5-7, 2-6
2022-05-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Morris / Cheryl Woodward vs Marge Street / Sarah Croft-Whelan4-6, 1-6
2022-05-21vs 21 RCC KochWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeth Morris / Windy Campbell vs Julie Scott / Amy Boschen7-5, 6-3
2022-05-15vs 17 TDC Team CauseyWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristin Kim / Alice Ulrichs vs Eliza Causey / Anna Gibellato6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBeth Jones / Beth Morris vs Kumiko Suzuki / Becky Harper6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-30vs 5 Hermitage Lines 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Dortch / Beth Morris vs Leslie Hardesty / Kimberly Ross6-4, 6-2
2022-04-23vs 13 Burkwood FarmerWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeth Jones / Beth Morris vs Susan Fisher / Ellen Bedichek7-5, 6-4
2022-04-09vs 9 MAC GreenspoonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Kim / Alice Ulrichs vs Susan Greenspoon / Michelle Jepson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Deena Kretzer
published 3.5
3.30
Kristin Kim
published
3.26
Alice Ulrichs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Windy Campbell
published
3.22
Alice McCollum
published 3.5
3.17
Beth Stafford
published 3.5
3.13
Beth Morris
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.10
Patricia Loyde
published
3.10
Cheryl Woodward
published 3.5
3.08
Margaret Duke
published
3.01
Jennifer Dortch
published
2.88
Kristen Roper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alice Ulrichs + Beth Morris224 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Roper + Beth Stafford123 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Roper + Alice McCollum033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deena Kretzer
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Kristin Kim
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Alice Ulrichs
86W–77L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Windy Campbell
5W–17L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alice McCollum
23W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Beth Stafford
17W–11L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Beth Morris
135W–138L career · 7 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Patricia Loyde
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cheryl Woodward
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Margaret Duke
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Dortch
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
Kristen Roper
23W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.