Teams

JCA - Seeker

2021 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-10vs Eagle Harbor - AiosaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Cusick / Susan Chiang vs Greta Pacilio / Stefannie Godfrey6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Seeker vs Mary Knox6-1, 6-0
2021-06-26vs Julington Creek - BermanWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Cusick / Staci Hill vs Karen Berman / Angie Lively1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Seeker vs Lisa Benedict6-3, 6-4
2021-06-19vs Duval - Club Continental - OwenLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Cusick / Staci Hill vs Jen Bates / Claudine Owen4-6, 0-6
2021-06-05vs FYC - VanderHeydenWon 10
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Seeker vs Merrill Chandler2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-22vs Julington Creek - BermanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStaci Hill / Kelly Cusick vs Karen Berman / Angie Lively5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Seeker vs Gerri Zona-Buchanan6-2, 6-0
2021-05-15vs San Jose - HennessySplit 11
W#1 DoublesStaci Hill / Kelly Cusick vs Nancy Hennessy / Melissa Brannon2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Seeker vs Heather Riley2-6, 1-6
2021-05-08vs Southside - BerryLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Cusick / Staci Hill vs Elaine Guyot / Stephanie Goodemote3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Seeker vs Hillary Berry4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Krista Murray
published
3.57
Kelly Cusick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Elizabeth Seeker
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Amy Rice
published 3.5
3.02
Staci Hill
published
3.00
Susan Chiang
published
2.87
Kim Alexander
published
2.83
Irene Wolfe
published 3
Rosemary Arnold
published
Susan Sceifers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Cusick + Elizabeth Seeker251359% games+2.2% vs expected
Staci Hill + Irene Wolfe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Krista Murray
13W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
Kelly Cusick
107W–55L career · 6 lines in 2021
28%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Elizabeth Seeker
82W–64L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Amy Rice
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.20
Staci Hill
20W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
3.02
Susan Chiang
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00
Kim Alexander
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Irene Wolfe
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
Rosemary Arnold
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Sceifers
12W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.