Teams

WI Combo Mixed 6.5 MALT Mavlyutov

2025 WI Other · WI Combo Mixed 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-14vs WI Combo Mixed 6.5 MALT PrahlLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Katz / Karelyn Hopkins vs Amy Moy / Shaleen Deep0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Krylova / Lucas Wysiatko vs Hung Manh Nguyen / Emma Verret5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Nishant Tilak vs Jack Ciske / Molly Moritz2-6, 3-6
2025-12-07vs WI Combo Mixed 6.5 MALT CusackWon 21
L#1 DoublesEdward Halsted / Anna Krylova vs Jennifer Syburg / Christopher Cusack1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKarelyn Hopkins / Lucas Wysiatko vs Lauren Balistreri / Alfred Sun6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulia Hazenberg / Timur Mavlyutov vs Dan Bernhardt / Tara Mohan6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesAnna Krylova / Lucas Wysiatko vs McKenna Lewis / Charlie Oberman6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSarah DeKraay / Nishant Tilak vs Haiyan Zhou / Ken Yan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Timur Mavlyutov vs SOUMYA PALREDDY / Ian Lowe6-0, 6-3
2025-11-16vs WI Combo Mixed 6.5 MALT PrahlLost 03
L#1 DoublesKarelyn Hopkins / Lucas Wysiatko vs Megan Prahl / Paul Prahl4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAnna Krylova / Edward Halsted vs Abtin Molavi / Amy Moy6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJulia Hazenberg / Timur Mavlyutov vs Krish M / Miranda Prahl0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesEdward Halsted / Anna Krylova vs Martin Mccluskey / McKenna Lewis6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Timur Mavlyutov vs Sora Kim / Sendelbach Sendelbach6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSarah DeKraay / Nishant Tilak vs SOUMYA PALREDDY / Ian Lowe6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesKarelyn Hopkins / Edward Halsted vs Haiyan Zhou / Ken Yan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Timur Mavlyutov vs SOUMYA PALREDDY / Ian Lowe6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSarah DeKraay / Brian Katz vs Maija Balts / Martin Mccluskey6-3, 6-1
2025-10-26vs WI Combo Mixed 6.5 MALT PrahlSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKarelyn Hopkins / Lucas Wysiatko vs Megan Prahl / Hung Manh Nguyen6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNishant Tilak / Sarah DeKraay vs Abtin Molavi / Shayna Mace4-6, 1-6
2025-10-19vs WI Combo Mixed 6.5 MALT CusackLost 12
L#1 DoublesKarelyn Hopkins / Edward Halsted vs Jose Nunes / Eunji Oh4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLucas Wysiatko / Anna Krylova vs Dan Bernhardt / Caitlin Mosman6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Brian Katz vs Alfred Sun / Tara Mohan4-6, 3-6
2025-10-05vs WI Combo Mixed 6.5 MALT CusackWon 21
L#1 DoublesLucas Wysiatko / Anna Krylova vs Christopher Cusack / Jennifer Syburg1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKarelyn Hopkins / Edward Halsted vs Sanghyeok Park / Megan Cusack6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTimur Mavlyutov / Julia Hazenberg vs Iris Kurman / Kevin Askling6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Sarah DeKraay
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.32
Julia Hazenberg
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Yana Mavlyutov
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #2 Singles 21% · published
3.26
Edward Halsted
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.24
Lucas Wysiatko
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.15
Timur Mavlyutov
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 19% · published
3.00
Anna Krylova
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.96
Karelyn Hopkins
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.96
Nishant Tilak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Brian Katz
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timur Mavlyutov + Yana Mavlyutov12652% games+0.5% vs expected
Karelyn Hopkins + Yana Mavlyutov5161% gamesnot enough data
Timur Mavlyutov + Anna Krylova1442% gamesnot enough data
Yana Mavlyutov + Edward Halsted3248% gamesnot enough data
Lucas Wysiatko + Anna Krylova224 matchesnot enough data
Timur Mavlyutov + Edward Halsted224 matchesnot enough data
Yana Mavlyutov + Anna Krylova134 matchesnot enough data
Yana Mavlyutov + Sarah DeKraay134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah DeKraay
20W–29L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
Julia Hazenberg
25W–25L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Yana Mavlyutov
126W–152L career · 19 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Edward Halsted
24W–37L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Lucas Wysiatko
14W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Timur Mavlyutov
111W–140L career · 19 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Anna Krylova
52W–97L career · 25 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Karelyn Hopkins
291W–192L career · 26 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Nishant Tilak
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Brian Katz
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.