Teams

SD LLW WD LT Coronado TC/ West

2024 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WD Summer- SD · SD Women (4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-19vs SD LT Mtn View/ KanayamaWon 10
W#3 DoublesTara Toohey / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Karen Shibuya / Hikari Blancarte6-3, 6-4
2024-08-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Suiter / Janey Michaelsen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-05vs SD LT Mtn View/ TodaWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaterina Hart / Sarah Kimball vs Junko Toda / Miho Nakajima7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Tara Toohey vs Nahomi Kato / Elizabeth Estevane4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-28vs SD LT Mtn View/ AlvarezLost 01
L#1 DoublesJaney Michaelsen / Katerina Hart vs Fabiola Flores / Roanne Manzano-Roth4-6, 4-6
2024-07-22vs SD LT Coronado Cays/ HammondWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Webster / Sarah Suiter vs Tugce Varol / April Guerieri7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Vernallis / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Kate Shaub / Elizabeth Conlon7-6, 6-3
2024-07-08vs SD LT Peninsula TC/ GamaraWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaterina Hart / Sarah Suiter vs Kanoko Esheim / Sarah Schultzel6-4, 6-4
2024-06-24vs SD LT SDTRC/ MonzonWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Tara Toohey vs Kate Gill / Claudia Gallego Gutierrez6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women (4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Sarah Suiter
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.87
Katerina Hart
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Janey Michaelsen
published
3.68
Jill Webster
published
3.62
Sarah Kimball
published
3.61
Yvonne Hwang
published
3.38
Megan West
published
3.37
Elizabeth Dahlgren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Ruth York
published
3.07
Jennifer Vernallis
published
2.71
Amy Minicilli
published 3
2.59
Leslie Harrison
published
Tara Toohey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Suiter + Katerina Hart11556% games+4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Suiter
89W–57L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Katerina Hart
73W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Janey Michaelsen
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Jill Webster
15W–21L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.68
Sarah Kimball
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
Yvonne Hwang
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.61
Megan West
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Elizabeth Dahlgren
85W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
Ruth York
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.07
Jennifer Vernallis
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Amy Minicilli
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
Leslie Harrison
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.59
Tara Toohey
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.