Teams

1-JOregan-HR 5.5

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Day

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-03vs 3-LKindem-UNCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesClaire Bassett / Lissa Gotwals vs Kelly Johnson / Rebekah Farris2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJan ORegan / Barbie McGarrah vs Laura Kindem / Sarah Brincefield4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-09-21vs 2-LGilchrist-CHCC 5.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesClaire Bassett / Barbie McGarrah vs Justine Zavaglia / Laura Porter4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJan ORegan / Lissa Gotwals vs Linda Gilchrist / Cherreka Kiel1-6, 3-6
2023-09-14vs 2-LGilchrist-CHCC 5.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAbigail Hatcher / Barbie McGarrah vs Marci Hansen / Julie Myers4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-31vs 3-LKindem-UNCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesConnie Brown / Lissa Gotwals vs Anne Heymann / Jennifer Gates-Foster4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBarbie McGarrah / Kathleen Fitts vs Amber Byrd / Kerry Ross6-0, 6-0
2023-08-24vs 2-LGilchrist-CHCC 5.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesJodi Preminger / Barbie McGarrah vs Cheryl Briner / Gillian Mishalko7-6, 6-3
2023-08-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesBarbie McGarrah / Victoria Taub vs Cathy Pierce / Brienne Caranasos7-6, 6-4
2023-08-17vs 4-ACombs-CCC 5.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Fitts / Lissa Gotwals vs Angela Combs / Thuy Brooks6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Abigail Hatcher
published 3.5
2.90
Lissa Gotwals
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Barbie McGarrah
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.83
Kathleen Fitts
published
Claire Bassett
published 3
2.59
Jan ORegan
published
2.56
Jodi Preminger
published
2.24
Rachel Hawkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan ORegan + Rachel Hawkins033 matchesnot enough data
Lissa Gotwals + Barbie McGarrah123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abigail Hatcher
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3
Lissa Gotwals
38W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Barbie McGarrah
82W–65L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
2.89
Kathleen Fitts
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Claire Bassett
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jan ORegan
8W–25L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.59
Jodi Preminger
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
Rachel Hawkins
2W–16L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.