Teams

WRAC-Andrews

2021 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-07-11vs CBRC-MehlenbacherLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Linnell / Mark Miller vs Kent Ozkardesh / Kathy Mehlenbacher1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Parsons / Dean Parsons vs Todd Samuel / Anne Neuberger2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJ Colleen Berry / Jim Kellogg vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Paula Davis-Vedder2-6, 2-6
2021-07-10vs CBRC-MehlenbacherLost 03
L#1 DoublesDean Parsons / Donna Parsons vs Kent Ozkardesh / Theresa Koehler6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Ovenell / Sandee Andrews vs Todd Samuel / Anne Neuberger5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRon Andrews / Elizabeth Linnell vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Paula Davis-Vedder2-6, 3-6
2021-07-10vs WRAC-NoydLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Linnell / Mark Miller vs Cindy Bowen-Lorrain / Brad Sourbeer4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJ Colleen Berry / Jim Kellogg vs Kelley Quinn / Michael Bendtsen2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Ovenell / Sandee Andrews vs Darillyn Flones / Bryan Noyd2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-07-09vs WRAC-NoydWon 21
L#1 DoublesDean Parsons / Donna Parsons vs Kelley Quinn / Michael Bendtsen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJim Kellogg / J Colleen Berry vs Cynthia Noyd / Bryan Noyd7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSandee Andrews / Steve Ovenell vs Darillyn Flones / Larry Woodward6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CBRC-Mehlenbacher227513110
2WRAC-Andrews134818128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Donna Parsons
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Elizabeth Linnell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
J Colleen Berry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Sandee Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jim Kellogg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Ovenell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Ovenell + Sandee Andrews4157% gamesnot enough data
J Colleen Berry + Jim Kellogg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Parsons
55W–18L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Elizabeth Linnell
41W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
J Colleen Berry
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandee Andrews
73W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
3.05
Jim Kellogg
19W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Ovenell
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.