Teams

Moore

2026 FW Combo Tournament · 6.5 Ladies

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-24vs HoltWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargaret Collier / Laura Stokes vs Jennifer Lucas / Tricia Spann7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Crawford / Kim Bell vs Kimberly Holt / Mariann Billings6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarcel Kerr / Katherine Dickinson vs Danielle Woods / Sue Stuecheli6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-23vs Anderson/HoytLost 01
L#1 DoublesKirsten Hancock / Jennifer Crawford vs Donna Schoolfield / Erika McCann2-6, 5-7
2026-05-23vs AlsagerLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Uptmore / Katherine Dickinson vs Julie McGuire / Grisel Diaz5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarcel Kerr / Kim Bell vs Maria Esteve / Gerilynn Sanders6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Collier / Laura Stokes vs Brenda Howard / Margrit Bazan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-23vs RobinsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnnette Baker / Laura Stokes vs Dina Hancock / Jennifer Smiley6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Crawford / Angela Uptmore vs Diana Mummert / Taylor Ratliff6-4, 6-1
2026-05-23vs SundaraWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargaret Collier / Marcel Kerr vs Diamira Avila / LAURA KOPCHICK0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-22vs FerrellWon 20
W#2 DoublesJill Moore / Laura Stokes vs Barbarita Nieri / Kari Fox6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Crawford / Angela Uptmore vs Shana Lopez / Danielle Andrus6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cooper/Rogers31841093
2Anderson/Hoyt317513103
3Sundara135716118
4Moore0421022137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Marcel Kerr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Stacy Burdick
published
3.09
Laura Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Jennifer Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Angela Uptmore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Katherine Dickinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Bell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Dickinson + Angela Uptmore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marcel Kerr
15W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Stacy Burdick
17W–24L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Laura Stokes
31W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.09
Jennifer Crawford
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Angela Uptmore
19W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
Katherine Dickinson
11W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
Kim Bell
21W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.