Teams

Binns/Kralj

2019 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Katherine Kralj
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Crystal Bryant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2019-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Katherine Kralj vs Kim Gowie / JENNIFER BELOY6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2019-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Binns / Crystal Bryant vs Dana McKillop / Lanell Nolf6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2019-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Katherine Kralj vs Christy Grisham / JENNIFER BELOY6-4, 6-3
2019-07-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Binns / Katherine Kralj vs Itsuko Day / DuplicateWendy DuplicateHaselnus6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2019-07-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Binns / Crystal Bryant vs Mary Klinger / Tonya Dirk7-5, 6-1
2019-06-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Binns / Crystal Bryant vs Babette Zielinski / Ellen Bowman0-6, 6-0, 1-0
2019-06-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Binns / Katherine Kralj vs Suzanne DeLea / Kaie Wellman6-4, 7-5
2019-06-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Katherine Kralj vs BreAnn Granville / Marissa Guzman6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Katherine Kralj
142W–116L career
6%94%0%
3.63
4
Crystal Bryant
105W–117L career
24%76%0%
3.53

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.