Teams

7-TPrinstein-HR

2023 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-11Won 10
W#2 SinglesBarbie McGarrah vs Kaitlyn Quigley6-0, 6-3
2023-06-28vs 2-CPeterson-HVCCLost 01
L#3 SinglesNicole Dolan vs Kerry Burleigh6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-27vs 6-LBaxter-CHTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesDrew Scruggs vs Breah Woolson2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKim Cabelka vs Amber Jarvis5-7, 2-6
2023-06-13vs 5-MFulton-UNCWon 30
W#1 SinglesDrew Scruggs vs Vera Halpern5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCLARE MURRAY vs Meghan Fulton4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBarbie McGarrah vs Rebecca Badgett5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-06vs 1-KLAAN-Eno-18 3.0Lost 02
L#2 SinglesKim Cabelka vs Kristi Laan3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesNicole Dolan vs Kinsey Wennerstrom0-6, 1-6
2023-05-23vs 4-GLoFrese-Eno-18 3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesDrew Scruggs vs Barbara Wilhelm2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCLARE MURRAY vs Gretchen LoFrese4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesBarbie McGarrah vs Alexa Hartenstein1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Nicole Dolan
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
3.01
Drew Scruggs
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.94
Kim Cabelka
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Barbie McGarrah
usually #3 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.76
Dana Okeefe
published 3
2.74
CLARE MURRAY
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Tina Prinstein
published
2.59
Jan ORegan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Cabelka + Barbie McGarrah2344% gamesnot enough data
CLARE MURRAY + Nicole Dolan213 matchesnot enough data
Drew Scruggs + Nicole Dolan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Nicole Dolan
94W–103L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Drew Scruggs
59W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Kim Cabelka
89W–93L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Barbie McGarrah
82W–65L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Dana Okeefe
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
CLARE MURRAY
38W–85L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Tina Prinstein
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Jan ORegan
8W–25L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.