Teams

Valley-Troublemakers

2026 18 & Over Little State · Ladies 4.0 Flight

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · Ladies 4.0 Flight
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1San Antonio-Love Hurts000000
2Corpus: Racq Pacq000000
3Laredo-Servivors000000
4Valley-Troublemakers000000
5NOHO-Wise Aces000000
6Houston-Game, Set, Pour000000
7Waco-Shanks Happen000000
8Houston-Win or Booze000000
9Austin-Volley Llamas000000
10Corpus- Making it Happen000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Mary Scaief
published
3.60
Rachel Kram
published
3.56
Denise Kayani
published 4
3.56
3.55
Dallas Dawy
published 3.5
3.52
Paula Fields
published
3.40
Tabitha Torres
published
3.40
Toni Ibarra
published
3.29
Anica Diaz
published 3.5
3.24
Margo Russell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Kayani + Susan Michelle Kyral3347% games+3.9% vs expected
Rachel Kram + Denise Kayani4642% games−8.4% vs expected
Rachel Kram + Susan Michelle Kyral033 matchesnot enough data
Paula Fields + Margo Russell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Scaief
32W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Rachel Kram
17W–20L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Denise Kayani
18W–24L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Susan Michelle Kyral
10W–21L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Dallas Dawy
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Paula Fields
27W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.52
Tabitha Torres
12W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.40
Toni Ibarra
28W–39L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Anica Diaz
29W–25L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Margo Russell
19W–31L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.