Teams

RJampani (Blakeney)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-03vs LMadonna (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRadhika Jampani / Antoinette Tan vs Jona Ashford / Kristina Campbell6-0, 6-2
2022-04-26vs SKopf (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAntoinette Tan / Lindsay Nichols vs Melissa Orr / Marcy Williams6-3, 6-1
2022-04-19vs AEllis (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#1 DoublesShanin Trivanovic / Becca Smith vs Ree Snyder / Abbey Ellis6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiane DeMus / Laurey Cosentino vs Ashley Duncan / Jillian Doppalapudi6-1, 6-1
2022-04-18vs ALedoux/DFricke (Firethorne)Won 10
W#2 DoublesShanin Trivanovic / Lindsay Nichols vs Renu Renu Gill / Danielle Fricke6-1, 6-2
2022-04-12vs CMcKiernan/VShannon (Raintree)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAntoinette Tan / Radhika Jampani vs Theresa Joiner / Hannah Wilkerson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane DeMus / Maureen Polonus vs Peyton Foley / Mary Anne Bullock1-6, 3-6
2022-03-29vs TAmos/AEagan (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDiane DeMus vs Renata Riechelmann0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesShikha Agrawal / Antoinette Tan vs Meredith BROUSE / Mary Eshleman6-1, 7-5
2022-03-01vs MMcSherry (PCC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDiane DeMus / Melanie Cox vs Barbara van Meerten / Cindy Stater2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesShanin Trivanovic vs Meg McSherry6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Shanin Trivanovic
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Shikha Agrawal
published
2.46
Laurey Cosentino
published
2.40
Antoinette Tan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.24
Radhika Jampani
published
2.09
Diane DeMus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.85
Maureen Polonus
published
Alia Nassri
published
Betsy Sprenger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane DeMus + Maureen Polonus044 matchesnot enough data
Antoinette Tan + Shikha Agrawal123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Shanin Trivanovic
55W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
2.91
Shikha Agrawal
6W–15L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
Laurey Cosentino
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
3
Antoinette Tan
69W–117L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.40
Radhika Jampani
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Diane DeMus
17W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Maureen Polonus
1W–23L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Alia Nassri
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Betsy Sprenger
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.